Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — alcover

alcover

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jan 23, 2018, 4:02 PM UTC
HN karma
680
Public activity
397 items

About alcover

Experiments in C at github.com/alcover

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48658856

    fun repeat(str :: String, n :: Nat) :: List: [body] I may be over-sensitive to looks but... god why ? fun repeat(str: String, n: Nat): List = would be prettier. (I guess authors ha…

  2. comment
    Comment #48317323

    Fascinating broken-bot glitch, thank you. Reminds me of some sci-fi movies.

  3. comment
    Comment #47254958

    May the Gods be with him. The nostalgia is very strong. Opening Flash and start a new project was an immense source of joy to me in the 00's.

  4. comment
    Comment #46981514

    Thank you. This reading lowers my anxiety. I believe we'll rationally - and in a hurry - come down to this kind of solution. It makes solid sense.

  5. comment
    Comment #46482648

    > (1) If I read "io.print", is this "the print function in the module io" or "the print method for the variable io" I don't see the issue. Just look up the id ? Moreover, if module…

  6. comment
    Comment #46368783

    That's it. Plus they would work neatly on old computers/phones.

  7. comment
    Comment #46367870

    I agree. Something componenty like Flash, yes. But it'd be easier to subset what already exists..

  8. comment
    Comment #46367810

    Oh they would care if one shows them much snappier versions of services they use. They just don't know better.

  9. comment
    Comment #46367758

    > that means being compatible with websites that normal people use No, new adhering websites would emerge and word of mouth would do the rest : normal people would see this fast ne…

  10. comment
    Comment #46367453

    I wish for this new year we reboot the Web with a super light standard and accompanying ecosystem with - A small and efficient JS subset, HTML, CSS - A family of very simple browse…

  11. comment
    Comment #45939361

    I am also doing this. Like you i guess I want a nicer C. I produce my own errors though because it's better for the user.

  12. comment
    Comment #45788258

    Naive question: would using such an OS bring some security by obscurity ?

  13. comment
    Comment #45784475

    You need two keywords. One for assignability and one for writability : const ptr; // can't reassign, can't write-through (if r/o by default) const mut ptr; // can write

  14. comment
    Comment #45771571

    > you don't need both a "const" keyword and a "mutable" keyword What if the lang has pointers? How express read-only?

  15. comment
    Comment #45586092

    It's important because we seem to be the only (visible) thing that can scheme .

  16. comment
    Comment #45585827

    I agree so much. For all we know yet, there's nothing out there. Nothing conscious or even sentient. So our lives and the life on earth are infinitely important. I never understood…

  17. comment
    Comment #44438709

    > tracking of this information down to that level would be pretty pointless Maybe pretty pointfull tracking shadow economy. When Bob sells moonlight stuff his clients will more oft…

  18. comment
    Comment #44432781

    > Beware that only tagged unions are considered the same type I don't get it. Tagged union is just a design pattern.

  19. comment
    Comment #44184235

    > as Julia Ecklar sings, it's kind of like construction work with a toothpick for a tool. I was taught assembler in my second year of school. It's kinda like construction work — wi…

  20. comment
    Comment #44121292

    > Leta is also useless if your browser blocks all cookies, tracking pixels and other tracking technologies. Err.. it would still be useful to mask your IP ?

  21. comment
    Comment #44121280

    What if browsers supported a property like ? They would store the hash on first connection then verify on subsequent ones. I know this should be refined and hardened but you get th…

  22. comment
    Comment #44090880

    > "hardcode" semi-constants You mean you somehow avoided a load . But what if the constant was already placed in a register ? Also how could you pinpoint the reference to your cons…

  23. comment
    Comment #44090527

    OK but I meant in already native code, like in a C program - no bytecode.

  24. comment
    Comment #44090414

    I often think this could maybe allow fantastic runtime optimisations. I realise this would be hardly debuggable but still..

  25. comment
    Comment #43899055

    > You just don't have people like Albert Gonzalez/Stephen Watt in America now I don't know what the state of big corps netsec is today but these guys had it somewhat easy. They got…