Viewing profile — alchemst
alchemst
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 9:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 17
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About alchemst
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35320810
According to the recent "Task Force on Standardized Testing" from the UCs ( https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/committees/... page 23) SATs are better predictors than…
-
comment
Comment #34092809
I think you just summarized most of this list and this movement (not all! but most).
-
comment
Comment #34092617
Isn't it Berkeley where 80% of applications for faculty positions are filtered on their diversity statement (even for things like particle physics)? Or consider Stuart Reges being …
-
comment
Comment #34092551
I would say that McCarthy and his acolytes, was also motivated to do good (protect America). The villagers burning 'witches' were motivated to do good (protect the village, and inc…
-
comment
Comment #34092508
And isn't there in implicit insult in that? That an entire group is so fragile, that seeing a mere word on paper, in a completely different context, will somehow reduce them to emo…
-
comment
Comment #34092383
It is, but don't worry, they don't care about that group.
-
comment
Comment #29276246
Why not just ask him when he stopped beating his wife, and be done with it?
-
comment
Comment #29276106
Yes, but then isn't it clear that he isn't to be trusted (or how much he is to be trusted), and that's really what most people care about, they don't care why. I think that's part …
-
comment
Comment #29276067
It seems about the weakest one possible, in that it allows accepting either only tiny amounts of responsibility, or almost total responsibility.
-
comment
Comment #29275816
We (humans, AlphaZero) are both distilling the rules down. Some rules are easily distilled (a queen is worth more than pawn) some are more difficult (mobility, knight vs bishop). I…
-
comment
Comment #29275737
FWIW, I think it already has, actually, multiple times. My guess there are few factors in place -- people recognized motivated reasoning -- there are many studies the authors clear…
-
comment
Comment #27254383
Super minor note: it's "sow" (as in spread seeds, "reap what you sow" "sow wild oats) as opposed to "sew" (needle and thread...)
-
comment
Comment #27254322
There is something at best blind, and more likely to my mind, dishonest about the "It's just a trivial change" argument. It's used to bludgeon dissent. "You can't possibly be such …
-
comment
Comment #27254243
I actually think more generic worker's rights is better than expanding protected classes, which will always have holes.
-
comment
Comment #27254186
It seems to be a pretty unhealthy thing, psychologically. It's why 'gaslighting' is its own special term. It's what's often used in psychologically breaking people down. I think pe…
-
comment
Comment #27254127
Yes, but historically it was a joke, or surprise. Now it's a moral failing.
-
comment
Comment #26991390
You need to compare jobs you can get with same qualifications, of course. That's why we don't compare surgeons with janitors. Of course, most gender pay gap comparison do in fact c…
-
comment
Comment #26991375
That's not true. Obstetricians are mostly women and are better paid (on average) than internal medicine, which is mostly men. There are other examples. If you assume men are willin…
-
comment
Comment #26991341
Why on earth would you say "you have to know this isn't true"? If you see similar patterns across many different cultures, including ones considered to be more gender-egalitarian, …
-
comment
Comment #26991214
Oh come on, Thrasymachus is the OG strawman. All he does is go around saying how smart Socrates is, and how wrong he himself is.
-
comment
Comment #26991196
It doesn't really -- I don't think any business say "well, I'm paying for surgeons rather than pediatricians, which have more men, so I'll pay more." This would ignore obstetrician…