Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — alangibson

alangibson

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 06, 2017, 8:54 AM UTC
HN karma
5,503
Public activity
1,232 items

About alangibson

https://twitter.com/handheld

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49023813

    So the number is irrelevant. No one wants yesterdays newspaper. The only relevant number is the price to serve a frontier or near-frontier model.

  2. comment
    Comment #48422901

    Kids are definitely a net positive for society. They're future taxpayers. But that's not relevant to couples choice to get pregnant. I've never heard a parent say they had kids so …

  3. comment
    Comment #48422751

    If you invert the question "why aren't people having kids" to "why did people want kids in the first place" then the fertility crisis makes more sense. Kids were free labor and old…

  4. comment
    Comment #47275951

    Paywalled

  5. comment
    Comment #47173333

    Yea but every warfighter will get a waifu

  6. comment
    Comment #47173275

    It's not named the Department of War because Congress didn't rename it. Other than that, good on ya.

  7. comment
    Comment #47038321

    No. Feed-based apps are uniquely bad.

  8. comment
    Comment #47038158

    There's legions of companies that will do warehousing and shipping for you. Definitely costs though. That's what I mean by margins being a significant difference.

  9. comment
    Comment #47038139

    airtite.shop Stuff for old men like me

  10. comment
    Comment #47036234

    I got out of software and into physical products a couple of years ago. I wish I could say I was prescient, but honestly it's just so much easier to sell physical items. Margins ar…

  11. comment
    Comment #46915447

    Give a kid a phone with TikTok on it and observe them for a while. It's genuinely upsetting. They'll spend hours with their heads down just silently looking at the thing. All desir…

  12. comment
    Comment #46867073

    It seems straightforward to you because you're ignoring everything that makes this not work. Here's a big one: you can't put radiators in shadow because the coolant would freeze. I…

  13. comment
    Comment #46867068

    It seems straightforward to you because you're ignoring everything that makes this not work. Here's a big one: you can't put radiators in shadow because the coolant would freeze. I…

  14. comment
    Comment #46863072

    > arbitrarily large Space is not empty. Satellites have to be boosted all the time because of drag. Massive panels would only worsen that. Once you boosters are empty the satellite…

  15. comment
    Comment #46863036

    Shading does work; JWST does this. However I don't see how you can make it work for satellite data centers. You would constantly be engaging attitude control as you realigned the p…

  16. comment
    Comment #46862973

    ISS radiators run on water and ammonia. Think about how much a kg costs to lift to space and you'll see the economics of space data centers fall apart real fast. Plus, if the radia…

  17. comment
    Comment #46862734

    Several kW is nothing for a bank of GPUs. Radiators in space are extremely inefficient because there's no conduction. Also you have huge heat inputs from the sun. So you need subst…

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #46862594

    This. There's no scenario where it's cheaper to put them in space.

  20. comment
    Comment #46862572

    Either this is a straight up con, or Musk found a glitch in physics. It's extremely difficult to keep things cold in space.

  21. comment
    Comment #46862506

    [flagged]

  22. story
  23. story
  24. comment
    Comment #46745903

    I suppose they'll use the Rodney King excuse for this one. The guy we were kicking the crap out of on the ground made all of us afraid.

  25. story