Viewing profile — ajyoon

No, Irregular runs the sandbox environment that the models had access to run code in. The sandbox environment is not the same as the weights host.

> I may be too cynical You are espousing a literal conspiracy theory. Please look at the facts objectively. There is absolutely no benefit to OpenAI or Anthropic to be had from the…

There is a lot of research out there with answers to your questions. GPU supply chains are extremely constrained, making it a surprisingly tractable problem at least for now.

The entire point of the statement is to start international coordination.

jefftk addresses your bio thought well. > The reason they aren't more exploited is there really isn't much to gain from doing so. This is incorrect. The long tail of soft targets a…

You can at least make it harder by requiring US clouds to only serve models with guardrails, and encouraging other countries to do the same. But yes, the underlying issue is the mo…

> Yes, but didn't it always? Hence why my position is that this will get us back to relatively where we were pre-LLMs. Trusted access programs are asymmetrical, and so at least for…

Did the company apply for access? This is either a problem with your company or the trusted access program. In no way does that suggest the solution is total unfettered access for …

You admit that some attackers have the inclination to use bioweapons. Why would they not use the best tools at their disposal going forward? From the WSJ the other day: > After Ope…

In cybersecurity, a level playing field favors the attacker. Trusted access programs give defenders access to tools they need. It's not perfect (because there is an extremely long …

Hugging Face survived the attack because the OpenAI model only cared about accessing the ExploitGym dataset; by all appearances, HF was completely owned. GLM-5.2 was only used to a…

To everyone here pushing for total proliferation of open models -- what should be done about open weight bioweapon and cyber-offense capabilities? Is it simply the cost of freedom …

This is not the gotcha you think it is. Misinformation plays to all manner of political issues and sides.

What about it is not coherent?

Sure, but the point here is to add a fingerprint from the client .

Is there any evidence of this? It seems like a thing people say all the time, but completely unsubstantiated.

People have been warning about the dangers of advanced AI since long before open weight competition was a consideration.

Anthropic's valuation is driven by its revenue growth. Export controls harm this. Hype certainly plays a role, but it's simply not the case that revenue is not a major part of the …

I have never understood this line of thinking. Why would a company warn that their technology is dangerous if it wasn't? Looking at the ongoing Mythos export control issue, it's ob…

People are responding negatively to what looks very much like vaporware from a company stepping way outside its domain into medical imaging with a bizarrely positioned announcement…

Dual use does not mean weapon. And even then, it is simply not the case that all weapons fall under the second amendment.

Is your legal theory that any technology which is dangerous should be protected under the second amendment, simply because it is dangerous?

AI is dual use technology. This kind of posture is simply not tenable as frontier intelligence increases.

I wasn't buried, it was on the third page after the ToC