Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ajss

ajss

HN member
Joined
Tue, Dec 20, 2016, 7:51 AM UTC
HN karma
42
Public activity
23 items

About ajss

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #18746665

    > The function `a -> Maybe a` is a different function than `a -> a`. Despite his intuition that the latter provides a stronger guarantee and shouldn't break code, callers may be ex…

  2. comment
    Comment #18696025

    I really dislike that. The document is mutable and goes through a whole sequence of states that aren't what you want? Constructing a body object with a document argument modifies t…

  3. comment
    Comment #18363859

    People were running a real money service that consumed JSON from another service and it didn't validate the incoming JSON? Wow.

  4. comment
    Comment #17783089

    Along a similar line, I love Stuart Halloway's talk on Narcissistic Design - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEZv-kQUSi4 Prefer APIs over data. Start with DSLs. Always connect (and…

  5. comment
    Comment #17424788

    Specs are not scoped. There's a global registry. You may end up chasing other people's bugs.

  6. comment
    Comment #16893475

    I think "late indexing" maybe referring to an implementation detail. The indexes aren't updated after each transaction. When you query the db, the result is a merge between the ind…

  7. comment
    Comment #15527570

    Look at the function doc string. Look at the function spec/fdef Look at the function comments. OK, there aren't any. Pull requests accepted?

  8. comment
    Comment #13349055

    (defn [o n] (.write o n)) will have to look up the .write method by doing reflection on o & n at runtime, which is really slow. (defn [^WriteInterface o ^long n] (.write o n)) can …

  9. comment
    Comment #13338169

    Emacs for Swift, Objective C, C, C++, Clojure, Python, Java, Javascript, Assembler, Bash, and random other minor stuff. Wait... there are other IDEs?

  10. comment
    Comment #13267315

    Ayn Rand didn't use force to take anyone's money. That's what she hated. When those who took her money offered her a small portion back, her philosophy didn't require her to refuse…

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #13266428

    Robbing producers of wealth that did not also happen to be the owners of politicians is directly contrary to Rand's moral system.

  13. comment
    Comment #13266403

    Her reasons were given a long time before she ever received social security (1974). Rand's moral system did not require her to file lawsuits that had no chance of success.

  14. comment
    Comment #13266375

    You don't think government taxes by force? What about all the people imprisoned for not paying their taxes? She became a wealthy woman from her successful books, so she paid far mo…

  15. comment
    Comment #13241783

    > My point is that there are other variables to take into account other than prices. You said quality food was reserved only for rich people. People with a median income in western…

  16. comment
    Comment #13241018

    > Why is quality food reserved only for rich people? Are you kidding?

  17. comment
    Comment #13239627

    Modern medicine, access to all the world's knowledge on a handheld device in your pocket, cheap clean/safe water and food from every corner of the world, entertainment (music/films…

  18. comment
    Comment #13225531

    I'm quite happy to accept the reporting of both gross taxes and gross subsidies. My objection is to only comparing the gross subsidies.

  19. comment
    Comment #13225335

    I subtract all their taxes. If Exxon pays $100bn/yr in various normal taxes, and the government pays them $1bn/yr in fossil fuel subsidies, that's a net subsidy of -$99bn/yr. How c…

  20. comment
    Comment #13224933

    > If there is a tax that's applied specifically to gas companies that isn't directly paying for infrastructure they use, then that tax can be subtracted from the subsidies. But the…

  21. comment
    Comment #13224596

    Even granting your argument, if the government takes $x as a service charge for infrastructure, and subsidises by $y, that would be a net subsidy of $y, not $y+$x. But $x is not a …

  22. comment
    Comment #13218272

    Whatever the intentions of the people imposing the tax, the effect is to disincentivize gas consumption. My point is, if the government taxes certain activities by $x and subsidise…

  23. comment
    Comment #13218208

    Looking at the gross subsidy is misleading. Federal gas tax revenues alone are about $35bn/yr.