Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ajoberstar

ajoberstar

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 19, 2020, 5:47 PM UTC
HN karma
67
Public activity
17 items

About ajoberstar

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47843308

    Nice to see some seemingly jujutsu inspired features getting into Git core. git history reword ~= jj describe git history split ~= jj split https://git-scm.com/docs/git-history htt…

  2. comment
    Comment #45472688

    It's not even the same ballpark.

  3. comment
    Comment #45070816

    Definitely. Should have phrased it as "cant's see it's that reasonable a use of time _for most people_".

  4. comment
    Comment #45070649

    I was on my 3rd Synology over the last 12 years or so. They were solid and something I didn't have to pay attention to. But the drive lock-in tipped me over the edge when I needed …

  5. comment
    Comment #44082792

    It doesn't seem like you're talking about the same thing the article is. Graham doesn't say "you must be a good writer to be a good thinker". > This is only true of writing that's …

  6. comment
    Comment #42549563

    Nest thermostats have a heat and cool mode where you have setpoints for each. On older ones there was a limit on how close the two could be set.

  7. comment
    Comment #42121834

    > The problem stems from the fact that Unicode encodes characters rather than "glyphs," which are the visual representations of the characters. There are four basic traditions for …

  8. comment
    Comment #39911824

    That's not what happened. Downstream was building from source, that source just had malicious code in it. One part was binary, the test file (pretty common), but checked into the r…

  9. comment
    Comment #39453284

    Git would make you merge or rebase, but yes there wouldn't be a conflict. They're saying Pijul would let you directly push without having to deal with the diverging histories.

  10. comment
    Comment #39083126

    As with other versions of Datomic, this is not open source (only binaries are Apache licensed). EDIT: Rephrased to sound less snarky. Not inherently a bad thing, but it's a limitin…

  11. comment
    Comment #36526830

    In the replies they link to this blog post with the details. Using the UBI images and public cloud instances does seem like a clever way to handle that. https://rockylinux.org/news…

  12. comment
    Comment #36011761

    VS Code brought Language Server Protocol, so I don't think the "vision" balance is as one-sided as you imply.

  13. comment
    Comment #33872407

    I believe it's because it's from The World Ahead issue, which iirc always has bylines unlike the normal weekly paper.

  14. comment
    Comment #30767300

    Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see that called out anywhere. I don't believe that's true anymore, but correct me if I'm wrong. For reference I double checked here: https://www.oracle…

  15. comment
    Comment #30767248

    I personally haven't had a reason to use Oracle's because I like having the latest version and any actively maintained LTS versions available for development and would prefer to us…

  16. comment
    Comment #30767188

    You can get a paid commercial support license for Oracle's JDK to get an extended maintenance window. But Oracle's publicly available builds don't require a paid license. However,t…

  17. comment
    Comment #30767108

    Oracle's builds of Java are open source as well. The OpenJDK codebase is shared across all of the vendors that provide builds.