Viewing profile — ajl666

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

That's not a rebuttal dummy. Do you want the legitimacy debate confers your position? Then debate. None of my points are any one else's talking points. That's a sign of a non-dogma…

It's sad to see how easily westerners are mislead by our own leaders, who ape Soviet contempt for constituents and maliciously ignore voter inputs. You should at least make an effo…

The centralization has to do with cheap money. That appears to be a topic beyond your pay grade. Hacker News has a low skill base when it comes to economic understanding. VC funded…

We're talking about advertising, not monopolies. That's your first fail. Second, you present a false binary that we have either the duopoly, or the self-starting individual. Market…

You add more premises without first evaluating or addressing my point. You imitate the tone of rationality, but you cannot even follow the simple rules of debate. You need 2 premis…

Advertising is a judgement. It is a synthetic definition (defined but it's relationship to other concepts), but you want it to be analytic (ex: the number 5). You completely dodge …

Law doesn't trump language when it comes to the truth. Nazis had laws too

How is that definition of advertising different from language and symbol? Would an Icelandic saga be considered an advertisement for murder? You really have not thought this throug…

Hey downvoter. If the point is so weak, surely you can refute my moronic self with some cunning argument. Why are so many information scientists afraid of information?