Viewing profile — aj-code
aj-code
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Feb 14, 2012, 10:17 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 18
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About aj-code
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #12052154
In short, it's not. A robust scheme should be secure if the attacker knows the algorithm or not. The secret should not be the algorithm, the secret should be a sufficiently long se…
-
comment
Comment #12047515
This is a good overview of how hackers actually crack hashes if anyone is interested. https://www.trustedsec.com/june-2016/introduction-gpu-passwo... The other things to take into …
-
comment
Comment #12047104
The password hashing algorithm outlined is really not best practise, only 7 rounds and the use of SHA-256 which is a general cryptographic hash, not a password specific one. The co…
-
comment
Comment #8672239
I think the reality is that this style of attack is difficult enough that it would be something of a last resort, and probably only tried on high value targets. It'd take a long ti…
-
comment
Comment #8672111
You'd think so! But that's not what I found, I found the minimum, max, and average were all crap. Even the median wasn't very good compared to the 10th percentile (which I got the …
-
comment
Comment #8672047
I wrote a tool a while ago for testing network based timing attacks. Getting the measurement right is really hard, just taking the average doesn't generally work while the 10th per…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #5297324
Sure is! It would be possible to use a challenge response authentication scheme ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenge%E2%80%93response_auth... ) but just doing things over HTTPS…
-
comment
Comment #5297210
This has some fairly serious security issues, which is fine for a something not designed to be seriously used (or at all). However, the readme implies you could use this and your f…
-
comment
Comment #3589435
One of the most useful features of that site used to be that you could tell at a glance which browsers the XSS payload would work on, and which it wouldn't. It hasn't been updated …