Viewing profile — ahachete
ahachete
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 04, 2014, 5:45 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,485
- Public activity
- 423 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ahachete
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49099851
Same here. Stopped reading.
-
comment
Comment #49090934
I feel ya. I'm always middle clicking twice, story and comments. This shouldn't be a script (no offense, great job!). It should be built into the browsers!
-
comment
Comment #48865990
AGPL and copyleft licenses are not restrictive , they provide forward (open source) guarantees . The only thing they "restrict" is the ability to remove freedoms. Therefore is not …
-
comment
Comment #48614048
> note that the local NVMe setup does have backups and WAL-archival to S3, which provides data-durability with RPO of 10s of seconds. That's good, it provides a reasonable level of…
-
comment
Comment #48613735
My 2 cents: > Each run lasts 10 minutes, long enough to move past warmup and capture stable throughput But short enough not to show the effect of checkpoints (which is quite notice…
-
comment
Comment #48552366
At StackGres [1] we find Timescale to be one of the most used extensions. Timescale is quite a successful project! StackGres is actually the first solution recommended by Timescale…
-
comment
Comment #48497659
TBH I don't think it's that straightforward, I see it more of a notable architectural change. At a very high level, this means: * Adding a sharding function, as you say. * Developi…
-
comment
Comment #48488884
I have mentioned this before, but here it goes again: I'm really happy that there's more options for Postgres sharding and I applaud Pgdog and the team's efforts and energy. Having…
-
comment
Comment #48487234
> having the ability to scale the coordinator past a single machine Since Citus v11 (released 4 years ago), any worker node can also work as a "query router" (a node that you can q…
-
comment
Comment #47971107
> You definitely don't want to run a production system at saturation! But it's worthwhile to measure a complex system like Postgres at saturation, see when it gets there and how it…
-
comment
Comment #47970347
> we find a Postgres server can handle up to 144K of these writes per second. That’s a lot, equivalent to 12 billion writes per day. Based on the shown graph, this is misleading at…
-
comment
Comment #47739737
Yeah, I know. Welcome to the club :( https://x.com/ahachete/status/2035783292549755228
- story
-
comment
Comment #47018033
> The extension model is great, but it doesn't work with existing postgres providers (RDS, Aurora, etc.). Unless one such extension becomes standard enough that all providers will …
-
comment
Comment #47013968
IMO transparent proxies for observability are not the best pattern. And I speak from experience, we developed the Postgres plugin for Envoy [1], [2] and we use it in StackGres [3],…
- story
-
comment
Comment #46739602
Postgres can really scale well vertically (and horizontally for read-only workloads) as the post shows. However, I'm still surprised about the reasons for not sharding. They have b…
-
comment
Comment #46713241
Java (modern Java) would be awesome!
-
comment
Comment #46713016
I'd also try it, but I'm Linux only ^_^
-
comment
Comment #46670625
Not my experience. It's junior level coding and maybe senior level advising, but even then only when clearly directed with the right questions and guardrails. As an autonomous thin…
-
comment
Comment #46669113
There's a fundamental disconnect: OP refers to senior engineers being replaced with AI, whereas the evidence and logical reasoning points much more to junior engineers being replac…
-
comment
Comment #46393095
Thank you for acknowledging this and updating the blog post correspondingly. I'd love to test and compare PeerDB with Debezium (Embedded), and even SynchDB. But as said, the licens…
-
comment
Comment #46391059
> "As part of the acquisition, we made an important decision: not only to keep PeerDB open source" > "Here goes the Open Source reference to our validation logic." > "PeerDB Open S…
-
comment
Comment #46383700
"Most components" seems a bit of an understatement when compared with the Framework. Sure, some components can be replaced. And not at the same cost (opening and manipulating the F…
-
comment
Comment #46381198
TBH I haven't deeply tested it yet. Laptop is a few days old and I'm still "automating the install" (Ubuntu autoinstall + Ansible tasks for post-installation including BIOS upgrade…