Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — afeiszli

afeiszli

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 15, 2021, 8:59 PM UTC
HN karma
227
Public activity
78 items

About afeiszli

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #37642946

    Blog post for context: https://www.netmaker.io/resources/netmaker-goes-open-source-...

  2. comment
    Comment #37148968

    It's definitely lacking on the unit-testing side and we should do more there, but we think integration tests are the more important of the two in this scenario, because the most fr…

  3. comment
    Comment #37148896

    Worth noting, the WireGuard creator has specifically mentioned these sort of management features (user auth, automated configuration and coordination, ACL's) as out-of-scope of the…

  4. comment
    Comment #37148306

    You can lock it down a good amount: - 80 is only required for Caddy to request certificates. If you BYO certs, you can take that off - TURN is optional, so if you disable TURN then…

  5. comment
    Comment #37148128

    We do have a CLA, and put it in place for this very reason. It is more complex legally, but I meant more in terms of the community. Better to make people happy by going less restri…

  6. comment
    Comment #37147599

    I think it's worth doing your own investigation on how often traffic is getting relayed via Tailscale. We don't have numbers on it, but have had users who experienced very high lat…

  7. comment
    Comment #37147535

    Netmaker also has a relay setup, when you don't want to do P2P: https://www.netmaker.io/features/relay

  8. comment
    Comment #37147506

    SSPL is a bit more restrictive, but politics also have a lot to do with it. "Open Source" is just a term, technically anyone could call their license open source, but most people o…

  9. comment
    Comment #37147229

    Kilo is cool! And works. It will be similar, just sort of depends on what you're comfortable with and what sort of management features you need. Some people like a UI where they ca…

  10. comment
    Comment #37147188

    Netmaker guy here, and I'll be the first to tell you that if you have a static setup of, let's say 5 machines or less, then there's no need for something as complex as Netmaker. It…

  11. comment
    Comment #37147147

    NAS should work if it's linux or freebsd based. For mobile you (currently) have to use our "client gateway", which accesses the network just using a regular WireGuard config file, …

  12. comment
    Comment #37147117

    Thanks for the feedback. Just wondering, with 0.0.0.0, are you accessing using "external clients" or the regular netclient?

  13. comment
    Comment #37147106

    Netmaker may help with this. You configure an "Egress Gateway" to 0.0.0.0/0 as your internet VPN, inside of a Netmaker network of 10.10.0.0/24. We do our routing rules differently …

  14. comment
    Comment #37147065

    You might find the github or docs more helpful, which are more geared to a technical audience: - https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker - https://docs.netmaker.io/

  15. comment
    Comment #37147019

    Hi, worth noting another point on this. Netmaker has "Client Gateways", which allow you to generate and modify raw WireGuard config files. This is extremely useful for integrating …

  16. comment
    Comment #37146925

    Hi! Netmaker here. At the time of this writing this is true, but we're making some licensing changes this sprint, which I think will make people very happy. We started with SSPL ju…

  17. comment
    Comment #36992695

    Really cool!

  18. comment
    Comment #34775916

    We decided to use Lago with our SaaS. Billing is super complicated and Lago handles everything we need out of the box. Building this stuff would have been a nightmare. Really cool!…

  19. comment
    Comment #33269180

    Yeah that’s what we used, but not all Linux supports it, and that still leaves non-Linux as well. But hosts files are universal.

  20. comment
    Comment #33267577

    Split DNS is super complicated to implement client side. We halfway implemented a solution and backtracked, eventually settling on just setting /etc/hosts. There's way too many var…

  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #31901008

    You can do a WireGuard server on Kubernetes with Netmaker: - https://itnext.io/multi-cluster-kubernetes-networking-with-n... - https://itnext.io/multi-cluster-kubernetes-networking…

  23. comment
    Comment #31829326

    You can run WireGuard in a docker client without giving it access to your internal networks.

  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #31275314

    Hey! Netmaker author here. I think it’d be a cool option for this use case. We have some users already doing blockchain stuff. Benefits are it’s self hosted, so you don’t need to d…