Viewing profile — advocateone
advocateone
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Aug 23, 2020, 6:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About advocateone
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #24522744
My guest booked today was Morgan Housel, a VC and former journalist who's frequently on CNBC. We had to reschedule b/c of a conflict -- this would have been the perfect day to get …
-
story
Tell HN: Podcast Looking for Startup Guests
If you've got a cool startup, and would like to get the word out - consider guesting on my podcast. Don't be shy, it's important to get in front of users & the market! Just Google …
- story
-
comment
Comment #24289411
I know this is obvious, but it's important to look at your online agreement or terms of service for customers to see what they've agreed to. If you're not legally culpable, I don't…
-
comment
Comment #24289232
Respectfully, I have the opposite view and left my comment at the top.
-
comment
Comment #24289160
In response to your question, about exactly where to come down on billionaires, I'm not sure but there are some great points on here, and for the folks questioning why so many tech…
-
comment
Comment #24286956
Hi Everyone - I know there's a lot of prose in the responses below, but you may discover a lot about the entire patent system (especially business method and software patents) and …
-
comment
Comment #24286910
Thanks much for your clarification. Regarding whether there are multiple patents issued on the MRI – (1) Assuming that the algorithmic steps work properly (i.e., without typos and …
-
comment
Comment #24268256
Thanks much for your insight, pedalpete. I found your comments helpful and insightful on a number of different levels. Regarding reverse engineering, while I don’t know the particu…
-
comment
Comment #24268210
Very well said, and insightful, truly.
-
comment
Comment #24268205
Thanks so much for bringing this to my attention. I took a quick look at the litigation docket for this case, which was consolidated with actions against a number of other defendan…
-
comment
Comment #24263489
Thanks much for your reply. Turing’s application of Godel merely says that there are some calculations a computer can’t do. There are still a finite number of instructions that are…
-
comment
Comment #24257346
That’s kind of a sweeping generalization for the few examples here and not exactly applying the scientific method, don’t you think? I hope you notice that I’m purposefully not usin…
-
comment
Comment #24257109
Sounds like you've had some bad experiences. I really appreciate your sharing this. Regarding the balloon, you'll have to check out some of my other responses about the obviousness…
-
comment
Comment #24257030
You make a couple of great points. Let me analogize the problem. Imagine that one day you’re reading books and working on computers and floppy disks. So your information is limited…
-
comment
Comment #24256807
Sorry for the long reply here, but I think a lot of people have the same thoughts, so I’ll elaborate. It’s not in the individual instructions that there is uniqueness, but instead …
-
story
Ask HN: Why Are Software Patents So Awful?
Ask HN: As a software developer from the stone ages who’s spent many years in the field of intellectual property (IP), I’m truly curious why Silicon Valley is so down on patents. T…
-
story
A lot of you otherwise smart folks are misinformed about patents
There's a lot of misinformation on the site about patents. Folks - yes, novely is still required for patents under 35 USC Sec. 102, and nonobviousness is also required under 35 USC…