Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — adsr

adsr

HN member
Joined
Sat, Feb 05, 2011, 12:31 AM UTC
HN karma
238
Public activity
227 items

About adsr

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #10119687

    Was it JTRIG? In any case, here are links to the stories from the Intercept. https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipula... https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015…

  2. comment
    Comment #9963690

    Fair point, perhaps I should have phrased it more as a technology with similar applications. I find it interesting that there are parts available now, albeit made on a 180nm proces…

  3. comment
    Comment #9963463

    I hope someone will give a push behind MRAM which seems like a more interesting option imo. MRAM has similar performance to SRAM, similar density to DRAM but much lower power consu…

  4. comment
    Comment #9698183

    Another point is the fact that mobile Safari wont allow the use of plugins. A wild guess is that ad blockers are the most common plugin that people use, so it doesn't seem unreason…

  5. comment
    Comment #9695833

    "I never commit to memory anything that can easily be looked up in a book." Albert Einstein It seems like this tests a) how much you want to work at Google and b) how good you are …

  6. comment
    Comment #9617762

    Yes, Gmail is definitely a brand but I don't need to have a Gmail account to send an email to someone who does.

  7. comment
    Comment #9617669

    I don't really get the first point about scale and brand, because the examples you give like email are built on open protocols, so it's the protocol itself that is the brand. I don…

  8. comment
    Comment #9195510

    You could keep pointers to both the head and tail in the list object though. Then adding and removing stuff would be O(1) for both ends.

  9. comment
    Comment #9141451

    Something is odd with that site. If I enter https://www.freakattack.com it reports Safari 5.1.10 as safe from the attack. If I simply enter https://freakattack.com it reports it as…

  10. comment
    Comment #8772460

    I doubt that would work well in practice. The reason is that timing is extremely important for this to work, if you're even one sample off you'll here a faint sound, and more than …

  11. comment
    Comment #8675142

    But it's only commercial in the sense that it permits commercial use, but it also explicitly leave the creator out of any compensation beyond attribution.

  12. comment
    Comment #8586189

    I think it's understood that what is done in public is public, however that is not the same as having the same information recorded, analyzed with facial recognition and machine le…

  13. comment
    Comment #8481146

    Can't this just be turned off with the Spotlight setting in system preferences though? For browsers it seems to be the same for all that uses the unified search field, it was last …

  14. comment
    Comment #8472079

    I don't think it's that clear cut, there are some inherent challenges related to privacy and internet, a persons past that may influence future opportunities in a way that's not re…

  15. comment
    Comment #8429874

    It's a bit more, the bool type can only hold two values, 0 and 1. (6.3.1.2 Boolean type #1) "When any scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the value compares equa…

  16. comment
    Comment #8416026

    > I give Linus a pass. Given the success of the project and the size of the team, I would rather have a foul mouthed Linus than perhaps no kernel and no Linux. This appears to be a…

  17. comment
    Comment #8412370

    In Apple's case, they use the ARM ISA but implement their own micro architecture and from vvhn's comment seems to also use a co-processor specifically for the secure enclave. But t…

  18. comment
    Comment #8410958

    It sounds more like they are using a Cortex-A5 to gain access to TrustZone with an existing x86 core.

  19. comment
    Comment #8334183

    It's a bit less than 4 in 100,000, which I think is an easier number to relate to.

  20. comment
  21. comment
    Comment #7851366

    But enabling private communication is not the same as a public free for all. Some information should use private communication, but not be shared publicly, some examples that comes…

  22. comment
    Comment #7825040

    In this case it's removal of your own data, so it's self-censorship if anything.

  23. comment
    Comment #7823359

    It's different in principle. I'm not saying that this will be easy to manage in practice, that's not the point I was trying to make. There seems to be some clear cut cases however,…

  24. comment
    Comment #7823217

    How so? It's not requests from the state that are discussed but from individuals. It also seems to be in line with Eric Schmidt's comment about how teens should have the right for …

  25. comment
    Comment #7805068

    It's published under the CNN name, which lends a whole lot of credibility to the story. Even if CNN is not taking responsibility they probably should, and this incident is a good i…