Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — adrians1

adrians1

HN member
Joined
Tue, Oct 10, 2023, 2:42 PM UTC
HN karma
19
Public activity
19 items

About adrians1

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48688769

    Oh, sorry. 99% of the time.

  2. comment
    Comment #48688171

    We weren't wrong just once, 40 years ago. That's just one example, but the Luddites and doomers were wrong every time something new was invented. Check this out: https://x.com/Pess…

  3. comment
    Comment #48688159

    We're not much better than our ancestors. We'd like to think we are, because we're much more intelligent and have access to more information. But we really aren't. We're still driv…

  4. comment
    Comment #48687826

    If you oppose LLMs and the field because of pure irrational instinct, like those people in the past, you can just state it outright, no need for complicated arguments.

  5. comment
    Comment #48687569

    Of course. Those people back then were stupid and irrational and couldn't see they were wrong. Today we are much more enlightened and smart, and our convoluted arguments, that soun…

  6. comment
    Comment #48687344

    Remember the debate about how nuclear was stopped in the 70s because of NIMBYism? We are now wondering "how could people then be so stupid and shortsighted?". Well, there you go, h…

  7. comment
    Comment #48678150

    > Why Does Everyone Hate AI? Because it was invented after they were 35. "1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the…

  8. comment
    Comment #46868585

    I don't get what I should be angry about here? That Bill Gates wrote something when he was 20? 20 year olds say stupid things all the time. Think about you when you were 20.

  9. comment
    Comment #46690790

    Given that, according to the ban proponents own words, social media algorithms are addictive as hell and impossible to resist, what do they think it will happen to those children a…

  10. comment
    Comment #40582519

    AI researchers are just as prone as everyone else to be self-delusional.

  11. comment
    Comment #39394047

    This is what people don't appreciate when quoting those statistics about how self-driving cars are safer than humans: when a human driver causes an accident, it was because that pa…

  12. comment
    Comment #38550381

    Agree, it's a serious vulnerability, but it's not exploitable remotely.

  13. comment
    Comment #38550083

    > Remote attacks work by first exploiting an unpatched vulnerability in a browser, media player, or other app and using the administrative control gained to replace the legitimate …

  14. comment
    Comment #38408315

    Not true, most AI doomers are actually worried about Skynet.

  15. comment
    Comment #38398464

    > But in truth, OpenAI was already a capitalist/commercial enterprise and has been for over a year and those concerned had already failed in keeping the beast contained. The cat is…

  16. comment
    Comment #38396912

    > Most of the ai safety arguments revolve around “once it’s powerful enough to cause damage it’ll be too late to come up with a strategy” I don't see any reason to accept this argu…

  17. comment
    Comment #38396816

    Even if AI is a threat, it's impossible to predict today how the threat is going to look in the future. The "AI safety" crowd watched too many Terminator movies. We'll deal with AI…

  18. comment
    Comment #38350064

    The technology was already developed with Microsoft money and the model was exclusively licensed to Microsoft.

  19. comment
    Comment #37832801

    > If the speed of improvement stays anywhere near the level it was the last two years, then over the next two decades, it will lead to massive changes in how we work and which skil…