Viewing profile — adrians1
adrians1
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Oct 10, 2023, 2:42 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 19
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About adrians1
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48688769
Oh, sorry. 99% of the time.
-
comment
Comment #48688171
We weren't wrong just once, 40 years ago. That's just one example, but the Luddites and doomers were wrong every time something new was invented. Check this out: https://x.com/Pess…
-
comment
Comment #48688159
We're not much better than our ancestors. We'd like to think we are, because we're much more intelligent and have access to more information. But we really aren't. We're still driv…
-
comment
Comment #48687826
If you oppose LLMs and the field because of pure irrational instinct, like those people in the past, you can just state it outright, no need for complicated arguments.
-
comment
Comment #48687569
Of course. Those people back then were stupid and irrational and couldn't see they were wrong. Today we are much more enlightened and smart, and our convoluted arguments, that soun…
-
comment
Comment #48687344
Remember the debate about how nuclear was stopped in the 70s because of NIMBYism? We are now wondering "how could people then be so stupid and shortsighted?". Well, there you go, h…
-
comment
Comment #48678150
> Why Does Everyone Hate AI? Because it was invented after they were 35. "1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the…
-
comment
Comment #46868585
I don't get what I should be angry about here? That Bill Gates wrote something when he was 20? 20 year olds say stupid things all the time. Think about you when you were 20.
-
comment
Comment #46690790
Given that, according to the ban proponents own words, social media algorithms are addictive as hell and impossible to resist, what do they think it will happen to those children a…
-
comment
Comment #40582519
AI researchers are just as prone as everyone else to be self-delusional.
-
comment
Comment #39394047
This is what people don't appreciate when quoting those statistics about how self-driving cars are safer than humans: when a human driver causes an accident, it was because that pa…
-
comment
Comment #38550381
Agree, it's a serious vulnerability, but it's not exploitable remotely.
-
comment
Comment #38550083
> Remote attacks work by first exploiting an unpatched vulnerability in a browser, media player, or other app and using the administrative control gained to replace the legitimate …
-
comment
Comment #38408315
Not true, most AI doomers are actually worried about Skynet.
-
comment
Comment #38398464
> But in truth, OpenAI was already a capitalist/commercial enterprise and has been for over a year and those concerned had already failed in keeping the beast contained. The cat is…
-
comment
Comment #38396912
> Most of the ai safety arguments revolve around “once it’s powerful enough to cause damage it’ll be too late to come up with a strategy” I don't see any reason to accept this argu…
-
comment
Comment #38396816
Even if AI is a threat, it's impossible to predict today how the threat is going to look in the future. The "AI safety" crowd watched too many Terminator movies. We'll deal with AI…
-
comment
Comment #38350064
The technology was already developed with Microsoft money and the model was exclusively licensed to Microsoft.
-
comment
Comment #37832801
> If the speed of improvement stays anywhere near the level it was the last two years, then over the next two decades, it will lead to massive changes in how we work and which skil…