Viewing profile — adr_
adr_
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 04, 2011, 10:24 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 122
- Public activity
- 32 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About adr_
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #26787937
I think Google already publicly disclosed the code to trigger this vulnerability: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/fd29e246f65a7cee13...
-
comment
Comment #26422852
For my part, I loved the long form, in-depth post, and I learned a lot. I'll admit breaking it up visually with some diagrams or photos is tempting (maybe a photo of your serial se…
-
comment
Comment #23412697
Clang 11 hasn't been released yet, right?
- story
-
comment
Comment #21438849
Hydrolysis is chemical breakdown via reaction with water. This is electrolysis. But it's a popsci article, so they put that in the subtitle. "Splitting" makes sense to people who d…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #8937617
https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/li... They haven't published Cisco bugs, but they do have a pretty broad scope.
-
comment
Comment #8564918
This sounds basically the same as: http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/messing-around-with-d...
-
comment
Comment #7832039
It is a fun mental exercise. I love this stuff, and that's the motivation. I once wrote an emulator for a 4 bit microprocessor in Befunge (a 2D esoteric programming language). Then…
-
comment
Comment #7210281
Unsigned integer overflow is defined. I agree that the carry flag shouldn't be exposed directly, but the ability to express "add and check for overflow" would be useful and allow f…
-
comment
Comment #6039795
If the NSA is working with Intel, they're not going to bother with an RNG... The processor is the most trusted part of the computer security model - why would you choose bad random…
-
comment
Comment #5516027
Absolutely agreed, I just thought it was a bit of an expensive suggestion for someone thinking about getting back into the hobby.
-
comment
Comment #5510977
I wouldn't call it more verbose. AT&T: sub $0x8,%rbx callq *%rax mov (%rbx),%rax Intel: sub rbx, 0x8 call rax mov rax, [rbx] Intel can be written with: mov rax, QWORD PTR [rbx] But…
-
comment
Comment #5510445
For a mere US$1129...
-
comment
Comment #5510440
This is a bad answer, but when I'm on Linux, I use objdump and gdb for most of my reversing. They don't really compare to IDA, though. xxd is fine for hex editing, especially in th…
-
comment
Comment #5509430
I wrote an actual libc-free "Hello World" program for Linux: http://codepad.org/rUckf7jR It should work as 32-bit or 64-bit and compile with clang or gcc. It compiles to about 11 a…
-
comment
Comment #5506772
I've forgotten when I learned this stuff. Recently, I've been teaching people who have been programming for years how to reverse engineer. It's surprising how much trouble they hav…
-
comment
Comment #5272221
try:print(lambda x:eval(x)if all(i in'0123456789.*/+-'for i in x)else'syntax error')(raw_input()) except:print'error'
-
comment
Comment #4573996
The approach of prompting the user "Do you want to call this number?" is far simpler and safer. After all, you could probably use tel: links or tel: redirects or something if the f…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #4033528
I just went on a journey through the remains of gopherspace. Thank you :)
-
comment
Comment #3995727
BCD is not a bad idea... It's not great, you can pack arbitrary precision values more tightly, and you rarely need to display them (even when you do, the screen is slower than the …
-
comment
Comment #3990088
They really are decimating their workforce. Ouch.