Viewing profile — absolutelyrad
absolutelyrad
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 09, 2020, 1:25 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 417
- Public activity
- 189 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About absolutelyrad
mDMEX/9mBhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAq7S+ixYNgjsaAI6XJFtR1lS+7/uX+Lo/l/lb r1OGqN60B3dheXdhbGuIkAQTFggAOBYhBO3RfLfBiCV1aagnYQDHuDh8vF68BQJf /2YGAhsDBQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEADHuDh8vF68zGcBAPIy rFCjqmuulNviohCj32LlvSraW+Vo8+a/HmcckWs/AP9bQVyC6QnvLMQo3tDd4+CJ f/ps4sTwIy+tbW3idF4tDg== =zGsT -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
I will not comment from this account again.
Rad says goodbye.
Recent public activity
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25742311
Anyone who cares about "free speech" should move to epik.com for domains. I want infrastructure providers to be neutral, and allow whatever is allowed under the law. Not Twitter, F…
- story
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25714272
Thought experiment: can we have a standard TOS for centralized services? Building the next Facebook? Legally bind yourself that you'll always provide API access and this right cann…
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25685969
I'm so happy for you! There's a company that is not public but working in this space, I cannot recall it's name. They use NLP to diagnose patient condition by ingesting raw informa…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25684127
The answer is chrome web store/firefox store and adblock/tracker block. They offer a hint into a more free future. Imagine if adblock wasn't allowed on those stores. Today the equi…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25684033
If you're serious about this question. The the answer is: a competitor could build their services on top of Facebook. They wouldn't have to start from scratch. Independent client's…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25683821
I'd argue that if apple didn't have a monopoly, we'd have stores that catered to privacy conscious people far earlier. If apple didn't restrict the OS so much, you'd have people ma…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25670611
Sure. I'd be interested.