Viewing profile — abofh
abofh
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 4:48 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,038
- Public activity
- 401 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About abofh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49238766
It got the executives it paid for
-
comment
Comment #49204790
You've joined an accelerator, not gone public, of course you're not ready to rug pull
-
comment
Comment #49204576
They couldn't handle sending webhooks for eight hours. That seems more than reasonable to expect.
-
comment
Comment #49118658
If you just want a smaller vocabulary, use French? If your goal is to communicate to an LLM, maybe saving tokens isn't the all in win, unless you like reading assert gronkHitThing(…
-
comment
Comment #49092291
I would love to pay a penny an article read by me my AI or whatever to a host of services provided they could prove the value first. These days I'm told which thousand companies my…
-
comment
Comment #49079230
Anonymous packets are a national security threat!
-
comment
Comment #49065063
Indeed, but should he say his real code was one digit swap off, could you prove intent? Color matters, but you can't paint with only one
-
comment
Comment #49043597
It's a binary rule at our firm. We trust bedrock but not mantle for similar reasons
-
comment
Comment #48952778
I hope it's profitable, because this feels like engineering for engineering sake and not actually improving the product in a way that draws customers.
-
comment
Comment #48887863
To an extent that's fair, but you do understand that "ive not heard of a vulnerability older than me" begs credulity? Especially with the fifteen years experience comment? I'm all …
-
comment
Comment #48887376
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48887344
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48887327
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48887224
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48818219
I remember years ago when websites would have buttons "best viewed in Internet explorer 4.0". We're past those days, but only because it's implied "use chrome, maybe webkit, we did…
-
comment
Comment #48668529
Somebody figured out how to make the trial profitable! I don't really feel bad about anyone here, they were subsidizing to get people hooked, someone turned the subsidies into prof…
-
comment
Comment #48639553
So many it's not X it's Y. It might have been polished, but it was claude
-
comment
Comment #48639492
This just feels like an excuse to give your dog a statically significant amount of treats
-
comment
Comment #48639339
Oh God I'm tired of ai written thought pieces
-
comment
Comment #48603487
I got tired after hearing Claude the whole way through, especially when they asked ai to run dig.
-
comment
Comment #48565201
Cursor which is just a ux on other people's models and only has value as a UI that can be replaced by those models... Jesus Christ, where do i buy cat bonds?
-
comment
Comment #48485484
Lawyers are gonna be making this a legal quagmire for years. Even after it gets retracted.
-
comment
Comment #48477994
Yes and no. Anthropic controls what is determined to be "similar or higher" and when models are deprecated. Will sonnet 4.7 be "too powerful"? Because once it's released. 4.6's day…
-
comment
Comment #48476657
Not a sub processor for us, so insta banned. Also spiked the ball on us updating our sub processor list. If they'd done something in-cloud we wouldn't have blinked, but no governan…
-
comment
Comment #48476397
Bedrock supports many models. Open weights models aren't far behind, maybe a year, 18 months. Given they could have done this with data residency rules being respected and chose no…