Viewing profile — abigailphoebe
abigailphoebe
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 31, 2025, 6:43 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 13
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About abigailphoebe
here to learn and share ideas
https://linkedin.com/in/abigailphoebe
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48934525
Hi all, I recently went viral on Twitter due to my solution for detecting and removing a very common scam on Discord, in the process of deployment I found that a little over 8% of …
- story
-
comment
Comment #47850237
i made a nice little write-up in addition to my paper on analyzing historical software metrics - would appreciate some feedback as this is my first 'technical' writeup. the 4 page …
- story
-
comment
Comment #46077421
i personally host my own git instance for all my important projects, i'm just forced to use github for work.
-
comment
Comment #46077309
i'm at an ai summit for my work, we're doing a hackerthon on abusing ai agents we develop. i attempted to fork the dummy repository and was met with "You are unable to fork this re…
- story
-
comment
Comment #45991925
ehh, not really. assuming a reasonable ratelimit, say 100 lookups per day (maybe some exceptions if the lookup results in an account that already has you in contacts, idk) - this w…
-
comment
Comment #45991057
eh, i'm not convinced. this was in the middle of a scheduled maintenance, with all requests failing at a singular point - that being a .unwrap(). there should be internal visibilit…
-
comment
Comment #45991012
that's actually a very good point, fair enough, i agree. regretfully i'm not sure if such a big language change can be made; though it would be nice. here's to hoping!
-
comment
Comment #45990982
just read the pre-print paper. they claim to have achieved a rate of 7,000/s, which is roughly 25M/h i do agree that is an absurd amount, especially when paired with the lack of ra…
-
comment
Comment #45990123
this is just... enumeration of phone numbers? how is this a 'security vulnerability'? an issue maybe, but it's not a vulnerability as that implies faulty code; this is a documented…
-
comment
Comment #45978390
you either misunderstand the rust ethos or are intentionally misrepresenting it. safe refers to memory safety. once again, if you write bad code, that’s your fault, not the languag…
-
comment
Comment #45975437
blaming the language is not the way to approach this. if an engineer writes bad code that’s the engineers fault, not the languages. this was bad code that should have never hit pro…
-
comment
Comment #45975397
kudos to getting this blog post out so fast, it’s well written and is appreciated. i’m a little confused on how this was initially confused for an attack though? is there no intern…