Viewing profile — abecedarius
abecedarius
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jul 02, 2007, 7:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 8,910
- Public activity
- 3,771 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About abecedarius
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49243549
I didn't carefully read either of these, but it reminds me of https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode-mcp/ (note it predates the filing).
-
comment
Comment #49144476
If your source is not open that's barely a speedbump, given a binary. At least that's my impression of the current state.
-
comment
Comment #49092385
Some of us considered seeking one of these jobs and decided not to. Some have quit (e.g. Hinton, OpenAI people after OpenAI reneged on safety commitments). Now you're getting this …
-
comment
Comment #48921962
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48911419
Mainly my point there is that it doesn't seem reasonable to anchor advanced nanotechnology on the doubling times we're used to for industry. I don't want to guess just what to expe…
-
comment
Comment #48911360
All our structural carbon is low tech by the relevant standards (civilization that can send star-seeds). https://dspace.mit.edu/entities/publication/49f95196-2ddf-48...
-
comment
Comment #48909844
> complex and interdependent ecosystem That's why my other comment pointed to the autotrophs with the simplest requirements, and the (unknown but complexity-bounded) origin of life…
-
comment
Comment #48909556
In the outer solar system organics and water are abundant (and in the inner there are plenty of carbonaceous chondrites, admittedly not the most generic inner-system bodies). Agree…
-
comment
Comment #48909460
If physics were to forbid closure at small scale, how could life begin? And how does a micron-scale autotroph reproduce?
-
comment
Comment #48909404
Yes, I was wondering why the focus on metals. (Admittedly they might be needed in trace amounts for catalysis, or convenient for conductors, etc., or for structural material if you…
-
comment
Comment #48908576
To target the "poor people need more money" problem, the most direct answer is give them money. If someone's answer is a variety of politically-allocated narrow subsidies, you shou…
-
comment
Comment #48886400
This assumes the best models continue to be publicly available. There's some level of capability where it makes more sense to go in business for yourself.
-
comment
Comment #48881935
The same AIs are doing math research now, you know. At what point do you stop explaining it all away?
-
comment
Comment #48871882
"High speed" here can be taken in terms like this: the phase of the wave function changes rapidly with position and time. (Changing with position -> a superposition that's heavy on…
-
comment
Comment #48866958
An OS is a virtual machine meant to be shared among programs. Sure the central examples expose most of an ISA that they run on themselves, but there are also examples like Inferno,…
-
comment
Comment #48866834
Aside: the example question ("What is the intuition that two reflections gives a rotation?") could have a more intuitive answer involving flipping an actual flashcard over twice, f…
-
comment
Comment #48866708
I don't know, I'm not very chemical, but fwiw: a friend and I were favorably impressed with Linus Pauling's general chemistry textbook. It tries to supply enough of the physics for…
-
comment
Comment #48749797
There's score voting too. I believe approval is the best focal point for this kind of reform because it's the simplest one, simpler even than the status quo. (In UI terms it's swit…
-
comment
Comment #48726386
Really I'm not married to that proposal, I agree some voting reforms like approval voting should help, and I don't think any formal changes are enough on their own to get our polit…
-
comment
Comment #48723148
Concentrated interests want legislation favoring them at the expense of the easily-misled public. So what's your model by which repeal becoming less near-impossible makes the net d…
-
comment
Comment #48720049
Increasingly wishing for this from a fictional constitutional convention: > I note one proposal to make this Congress a two-house body. Excellent — the more impediments to legislat…
-
comment
Comment #48719965
Heh, unintentional. Another term shorter than spelling out "orders of magnitude" is "decades", but I figure that's less familiar and even more confusing here. "Memory price started…
-
comment
Comment #48711810
Can you blame Moore's Law ending? The graph at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law looks steady up to the 2020s. 1979 to 2009 in the OP graph has a pretty steady drop from 10…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48630151
National debt to GDP was much lower in the 70s. You might be right that near-term disaster is unlikely, but comparing to a lottery win is ridiculous. Orders of magnitude off.