Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — aapl88888

aapl88888

HN member
Joined
Tue, Oct 27, 2015, 10:55 PM UTC
HN karma
26
Public activity
15 items

About aapl88888

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #27517421

    You are using a false equivalence. Almost none of Swedish billionaires are in high tech.

  2. comment
    Comment #27517405

    Almost all of them are old people outside of tech https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Swedish_billionaires_b...

  3. comment
    Comment #27491162

    Which US part suffered terribly?

  4. comment
    Comment #27491152

    If the US had its eastern part communist, it too would have a higher average GDP from decades ago. It is basic economics.

  5. comment
    Comment #27482584

    So the entire EU economy grew at the same speed than the US one but not its 500 bigger companies. This is misleading. The article says the poorer (former communist) eastern Europea…

  6. comment
    Comment #27424108

    What a misleading article. Someone sent out a letter and requested signatures.

  7. comment
  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #25023448

    I just did a Google search for QAnon for Tucker and Fox News. The news on QAnon are labeled under "conspiracy" on foxnews.com. I see no promotion of the QAnon theory anywhere.

  10. comment
    Comment #25023432

    That is a ridiculous argument to be honest. 100% of Americans have heard of Nazism. Does that mean 100% of Americans are Nazis? By your logic, more Democrats are QAnon believers (2…

  11. comment
    Comment #25023364

    I suspect you're lying because Pew research shows the vast majority of Republicans don't even know what QAnon is. More Democrats know about QAnon than Republicans (28% vs 18%). htt…

  12. comment
    Comment #25013946

    There is a rebuttal to the paper you cited https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-analysis/a...

  13. comment
    Comment #25013925

    You're arguing with a side that is using statistical analysis to detect fraud. Meanwhile your arguments are: - "fixation on wildly cherry picked data and missaplied (sic) statistic…

  14. comment
    Comment #25013903

    Here's the research and code. It's all open source. I find it very convincing but that's just me. Do your own analysis https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords

  15. comment
    Comment #25013886

    You can analyze the data yourself. There are sources and python scripts included https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords