Viewing profile — aakashprasad91

This is exactly the hard part symbols aren’t enough when each drafter overloads them, so we lean on the annotation + schedule context (fixture tags, notes like “DIM,” control zones…

Yep, exactly, when layer data survives the PDF export, it’s a huge help. We use it as a weak signal for clustering and object grouping, but never rely on it fully since it’s often …

Starting on their first project! Thank you!

Awesome — thank you! Easiest is email: aakash@inspectmind.ai or they can book a demo call on our website or upload plans directly on website. If they can share (1) a representative…

We do best on CAD-originated PDFs where we can use the underlying vector data, but we can run on scanned/hand-drawn sets too. In that case we rely more on image-based detection + O…

Great question. By “vector geometry” we mean we’re using the underlying CAD-style vector data embedded in many PDFs (lines, arcs, polylines, hatches, etc.), not just raster images.…

Great point! Owner’s reps and commissioning teams are becoming one of the fastest-growing user groups for us. At SD/DD we can surface coordination risks early, highlight spec–drawi…

Happy to swap notes. If you send a representative lighting plan set, we can run it and share how the detector clusters, resolves, and cross-references symbols across sheets. Always…

Hallucinations still happen occasionally, but we bias heavily toward high-confidence findings so noise stays low. On typical projects we surface a few hundred coordination issues t…

Yes today users simply gather the sheets for whatever phase they want reviewed (DD, 80% CDs, 100% CDs, etc.), ZIP them or upload PDFs directly, and the system handles the rest. It …

That comment comes across as racially loaded and isn’t helpful. If you ran into a real issue, I’m happy to take a look.

Could you share a bit more about what didn’t work on your end?

Today the workflow is simple: users just drag-and-drop the full drawing/spec set (ZIP or PDFs) for whatever phase they want reviewed. The system automatically splits sheets by disc…

Symbol variation is a huge challenge across firms. Our approach mixes OCR, vector geometry, and learned embeddings so the model can recognize a symbol plus its surrounding annotati…

Yes one of the biggest values of our system is reducing “noise.” Instead of surfacing 2,000 micro-clashes, we cluster findings into higher-order issues (e.g., “all conflicts caused…

We store files securely on AWS with strict access controls, encryption in transit and at rest, and zero sharing outside the file owner’s account. Only our engineers can access a pr…

We parse symbols using a mix of vector geometry, OCR, and learned detection for common architectural/MEP symbols. Cross-discipline checks are a big focus as we already flag mismatc…

We’d love that — perfect use case. Send a recent set and we’ll run a discounted comparison so you can see what we catch vs. what surfaced during construction. If helpful, we can ho…

Most teams run us late DD through CD anywhere the set is stable enough that coordination issues matter. Subs especially like running it pre-bid at ~80–100% CDs so they don’t inheri…

We see that a lot — specs that are clearly boilerplate or outdated relative to the drawings. Our goal isn’t to force a change, but to surface where the specs and drawings diverge s…

100% agree the hardest problems are workflow and incentives, not file formats. Even with a perfect BIM model, late changes and discipline silos mean drawings still diverge and coor…

We price per-project based on size/complexity not % of construction cost, so there’s no conflict of interest around bigger budgets. Today our main users are architects/engineers an…

Yep, the model identifies objects/conditions on sheets (fixtures, stairs, rated walls, landings, etc.) and triggers the relevant checks automatically. It can run thousands of check…

Great question. We currently focus primarily on coordination, dimension conflicts, missing details, and clear code-triggered checks that don’t require sealed structural judgment. F…

We infer the applicable codes from the project metadata + the drawings themselves. The location + occupancy/use type tells us the governing code families (e.g., IBC/IRC, ADA, NFPA,…