Viewing profile — aabhay
aabhay
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 19, 2014, 9:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,397
- Public activity
- 585 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About aabhay
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49251720
The relevant paragraph about Meta’s commitment to open source is here, and the statement is significantly less confident than news is reporting > • Open source is a positive and im…
-
comment
Comment #49250391
I have had a hunch for a while now that (in addition to these tools), Anthropic has actually leaned in to Claude's distinctive manner of writing since it makes the text more obviou…
-
comment
Comment #49152309
It makes it easier to write recursive async functions. It makes it easier for async functions to borrow rather than clone from their outer scope. All really awesome, non controvers…
-
comment
Comment #49146244
Yes but the second order effect of this is that the cost of the tooling goes up since it is now the bottleneck, and therefore the shoemakers that survive do it off of technical com…
-
comment
Comment #49132235
My main gripe here is the lack of transparency around the total experiment and construction. I doubt that they simply pointed their model at these ten specific problems alone and g…
-
comment
Comment #49132181
Given that we were nowhere near this state even two years ago, I think it’s a question of velocity more so than just distance.
-
comment
Comment #49111400
Can anyone that works on this technology provide an honest assessment of where this technology actually stands? How much instrumentation is actually required, what the interaction …
-
comment
Comment #49088871
It’s funny how much of a “ChatGPT tell” that thin weight accent header is. Sol seems to place that on _everything_.
-
comment
Comment #49066657
While there is “law”, how much agency does an average European individual have in shaping those laws? This is a multi national body for which you can’t vote for its leader. You can…
-
comment
Comment #49064521
178kb?! What are you putting in there, a JVM?
-
comment
Comment #49052989
I’m curious what makes you believe that this distinction is precise or meaningful. What exactly is the difference?
-
comment
Comment #49052978
Un what? There’s several friendly clauses among these proposals including > 8. Any contributor who feels they cannot write in English without assistance, may write in their native …
-
comment
Comment #49052928
I think the questionable term is not “syntactically likely” but “merely”. Syntactical likeness is a vast solution space that encompasses the work of a terrible developer and a geni…
-
comment
Comment #48974687
Not necessarily. Drop semantics are just syntactic sugar, and can thus be aggressively inlined or auto vectorized by the compiler.
-
comment
Comment #48965785
you're probably only allowed a subset of the query language to talk to an encrypted table. E.g. only range queries that target a sample size > 5% of rows, etc., with exceptions for…
-
comment
Comment #48927165
What strikes me the most is just how many different tasks are involved in modern model design. It used to be the case that you come up with a new loss function, slight architecture…
-
comment
Comment #48888635
tags could be display only with no way of filtering for a certain tag.
-
comment
Comment #48887429
Community generated tags seems like the obvious solution to all of this. You could easily give a setting to turn them off, breaks no existing systems, and allows for a broad emerge…
-
comment
Comment #48850308
> We chose a different consensus algorithm for Meerkat, called QuePaxa, that aims to avoid the “tyranny of timeouts” imposed by protocols like Raft. QuePaxa is a subtle protocol, b…
-
comment
Comment #48847829
This product feels bad and sloppy, so I’ll give my hypothesis for why this was built: At this point, Anthropic is likely having Claude itself propose and build features autonomousl…
-
comment
Comment #48847631
Exactly. The spec should go in a git comment, NOT vcs. Or, you keep the document in history for the duration of the PR and remove it post review or pre merge
-
comment
Comment #48841998
Yep. Tokio uses it for their tests in CI as well last I checked.
-
comment
Comment #48838123
The article says that if your read hits a master there’s no consensus needed. Perhaps I read wrong
-
comment
Comment #48836578
Looking at the implementation sketches, this algorithm looks even trickier to implement than Paxos (already a notoriously tricky algorithm to implement) and on top of that, I think…
-
comment
Comment #48811282
Its also because the CoT is probably unintelligible