Viewing profile — a2ff6eeb0
a2ff6eeb0
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 03, 2026, 11:01 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 75
- Public activity
- 61 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About a2ff6eeb0
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49251719
That was true until a few months ago. Now, it almost never has relevant results, and I've given up on it.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49250020
But it genuinely doesn't require much skill. That's the main selling point, in fact. Look at the prompts used to make progress on the Riemann conjecture: https://www.anthropic.com/…
-
comment
Comment #49249886
Nah, you really just need to tell it "the program broke: ". It'll go and poke around for you just fine. Try it sometime.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49249838
If the LLMs work as advertised, we won't need experts. Even today, with the current state of the art, we need far fewer experts. LLMs are already much better at debugging than huma…
-
comment
Comment #49249325
I'd encourage you to start referring to it that way,then.
-
comment
Comment #49249313
Did I stutter? I would like them all gone. I would like all visual elements to appear exactly in their final position and not resize, except in direct response to user interaction.…
-
comment
Comment #49248592
I'm constantly hitting the wrong button because some animation shifted it, some dialog popped over shit, or some notification decided now was a good time to cover the thing I was t…
-
comment
Comment #49248574
Check the phrase I quoted. Anyways, I guess OSX is open assembly?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49248167
It's just about as open source as OSX, which can be downloaded zero cost here: http://updates-http.cdn-apple.com/2019/cert/061-39476-201910... I love that Apple made OSX open sourc…
-
comment
Comment #49248022
I'd kill for regular UIs that did this.
-
comment
Comment #49247995
> The more open source software out there the better. Can you explain how I'd train my own version of this, reproducing the final deliverable that runs on the gpu?
-
comment
Comment #49233081
Yeah, that's what I mean by "they're much better at reviewing and debugging than writing code". When you ask opus to review for clarity, cleanliness, and minimalism using a clean c…
-
comment
Comment #49226674
Yeah, trying too hard to guide with hard rules, instead of asking the LLM for self-review, is going to go wrong. The LLM is much better at code review than it is at writing code. U…
-
comment
Comment #49226662
You're welcome to try it out yourself.
-
comment
Comment #49226073
As I said, feel free to experiment, I gave you some hints where to start. Or not. I don't win any prizes either way.
-
comment
Comment #49225899
Why wouldn't they be working on better harnesses? Every feature that has gotten popular has gotten integrated so far, and their product managers aren't stupid.
-
comment
Comment #49224982
Oh. So, because I said I work in software you assumed I worked in safety critical systems? Interesting. A little unhinged, but interesting. Anyways, as I said elsewhere, I don't co…
-
comment
Comment #49224678
This is all the stuff that the frontier labs are going to ship by default next year. Except for the architecture specifications, which agents can already do adequately for most sys…
-
comment
Comment #49224355
Since you apparently work on this kind of software, here's a challenge for you: take the last several bugs that were reported and paste them into Fable, pointing it at your code. H…
-
comment
Comment #49224337
Nope. I don't code for fun, and my employer will be very unhappy if I start sending people private repos.
-
comment
Comment #49224091
Making software is no longer very hard. It's becoming a few steps up from burger flipping. Maybe somewhere around line chef. There's still some skill involved, but the skill is mos…
- comment