Viewing profile — _skel
_skel
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jun 25, 2013, 1:44 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 18,047
- Public activity
- 4,351 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About _skel
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35485570
> It isn't realistic to counter a biking accident with claims that people are sacrificing their kids and that they are idiots for biking Who said that? Again, people seem to be rea…
-
comment
Comment #35485558
> The fact is you don’t know who this parent is. You have made the assumption that they are taking unacceptable risks. What on earth are you talking about? Who the heck is the pare…
-
comment
Comment #35485481
> The easiest thing the USA could do to make cycling safer without investing a cent in infrastructure is to adopt the rule that by default if a car hits a cyclist the car is at fau…
-
comment
Comment #35485435
I don't run the world and neither does the OP. I don't even live in San Francisco. It's not our fault that things are this way, and it's really dumb to blame us for pointing out fa…
-
comment
Comment #35485370
The OP didn't shame anyone. Why are you making this wild accusation? Read what was written. No shaming is there. You seem to be reacting to something you ascribe to the OP, but the…
-
comment
Comment #35485343
Danger is a matter of degree. There are plenty of places where the risk of getting hit by a car is lower than in SF.
-
comment
Comment #35485227
Most of San Francisco is not really dense either. Outside of a few well-known areas the entire place is a suburb.
-
comment
Comment #35485186
This is not victim blaming. Nobody blamed cyclists here. It is a true and obvious statement from an observer that cycling is dangerous in San Francisco.
-
comment
Comment #35485172
It's sad to see this comment being dogpiled by trolls, including the standard and annoying responses like "wrong takeaway" or "bad take" or the sarcastic "how dare people do X", or…
-
comment
Comment #35475020
What I'm saying is that the things the people who work at Internet Archive care about may not be the same as what end users care about. I think the end users care mainly about the …
-
comment
Comment #35473055
I'd bet that most people who care about this issue are primarily worried about losing the Wayback Machine. If that goes away, a lot of internet history will be lost forever. All th…
-
comment
Comment #35472974
Disclaimers are not a guaranteed release from liability. Especially in the case of libel/defamation law, and especially in the UK and Australia, where even true statements can get …
-
comment
Comment #35471020
It's not the Internet Archive's job to be the first one to try to resolve fair use questions like this, and attempting to do so put the organization's orginal core mission at risk.…
-
comment
Comment #35463484
What authority? It doesn't take much karma to vote or flag. Well under 100 points IIRC. Past that point, having more karma has no effect on what you can do on the site.
-
comment
Comment #35461968
What makes you think everyone is mega rich there? VC firms have a lot of employees making normal salaries just like every other company.
-
comment
Comment #35461731
All you provided is evidence that people moved away from San Francisco during the pandemic. We all know that. Many of the people who left could have afforded to stay and chose not …
-
comment
Comment #35459778
People leaving is not the same as displacement. Many people chose to leave during the pandemic for a variety of reasons, including tech workers moving away to work remotely. After …
-
comment
Comment #35458523
That link doesn't really have any data and it's not from a credible source. It's also an 19-year-old article. An entire generation of San Franciscans have been born and become adul…
-
comment
Comment #35457985
Digital cameras are not a niche. They constitute almost the entire global camera market. There are other review sites, forums, print magazines, etc. One website going away is not g…
-
comment
Comment #35457622
Who are the people who were displaced, and where did they go? This is all very handwavy. Why do you believe this narrative without concrete facts?
-
comment
Comment #35457550
Wrong thread?
-
comment
Comment #35457539
It's not wrong to be concerned about that in a property market where values can double in a decade. In fact it would be foolish to buy property in such a market unless you are rich…
-
comment
Comment #35457413
It's not like there won't be somewhere else to read camera reviews. Someone else will fill the gap.
-
comment
Comment #35457386
It's not even selling fancy cameras. It's reviews of digital cameras that are all either obsolete or about to be. Much of the data is only of historical interest. Amazon is not run…
-
comment
Comment #35457248
I know for sure it did. SF was famous for it for decades. It's even worse now.