Viewing profile — _pdp_
_pdp_
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 10, 2015, 7:37 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,564
- Public activity
- 1,148 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About _pdp_
https://cbk.ai
https://chatbotkit.com
https://github.com/pdparchitect
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #49246666
Considering that ripgrep, git, and, you know, other dev tools are part of the toolbox, then why ship them inside this executable? And, furthermore, if you ship them, then why stop …
-
comment
Comment #49243781
Plenty of previous art.
-
comment
Comment #49240680
Very interesting. Thanks for sharing.
-
comment
Comment #49196474
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #49181680
If you can spin up a new software project with little to no effort, the most important part of the job becomes making the right decisions and this is where we will be spending 99.9…
-
comment
Comment #49181098
Full disclosure I'm a founder of cbk.ai and chatbotkit.com, where we've built reusable agent components. I have never really saw flowise, n8n the now defunct OpenAI agent builder a…
-
comment
Comment #49180964
Because it is a workflow builder. It is the wrong mental model. Agents and workflows are completely different things.
-
comment
Comment #49180419
I might restart my old security blog then... anyway I wonder what will happen. I think it might get flooded by automated AI submissions.
- story
-
comment
Comment #49069199
How does that help 99.9% of all other companies though?
-
comment
Comment #49040136
Wake me when they deliver Opus 4.8 level performance for $5 per million tokens.
-
comment
Comment #49036435
I mean yah... host glm and kimi and I am game.
-
comment
Comment #49029887
I have mixed feelings about software factories! On one hand, our core product is just simply not fit for them at its scale. We've tried but the project is large enough to require h…
-
comment
Comment #49004223
Part of the threat model. If that is an issue then don't add the capability to the agent. It is simple as that. But we cannot guarantee that the agent wont leak some information. S…
-
comment
Comment #48998978
I don't think there is any dispute there is a real risk. But hype does not really help shape the conversation and this is the problem. I am sure both companies know more than they …
-
comment
Comment #48998336
I am not saying it is marketing but typically when there is a data breach you may hear from the CISO but most of the time is is vague PR response. In this case I get loud signals f…
-
comment
Comment #48997858
Perhaps you are right. We've only been using them for two weeks.
-
comment
Comment #48997759
Hang on a second. You think accessing private information in a public channel is a good idea? If a tool is authenticated as personal then it can be only accessed under personal con…
-
comment
Comment #48997629
We've tried them. So far quite expensive with not much return. This channel might not work as well as search.
-
comment
Comment #48997586
No channel will disclose private information. The only way to get that to work is to DM the agent directly or to use slash commands which are ephemeral / private.
-
comment
Comment #48997344
It is safe bet to assume that all of them are generated with LLMs.
-
comment
Comment #48997318
I agree with what you are saying but this is not how we solved the issue with who can access what. In our cloud harness we have the notion of shared and private secrets. When somet…
-
comment
Comment #48977726
I am not sure. I think of myself as a pro user yet I am finding hard time maxing out Pro tier. It only happens with sub-agents without any material returns.
-
comment
Comment #48976728
The reason most people burn through their allocated limits is mostly because of sub-agents. Stop using them and you will find out that even the Pro tier is enough for daily 8-12h c…