Viewing profile — _h4xr
_h4xr
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jun 15, 2021, 10:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2
- Public activity
- 83 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About _h4xr
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #2219225
"You are aware that the very definition of a fact precludes it from having exceptions, right?" He's talking about statistical distributions. "It's an established fact that six-year…
-
comment
Comment #2219159
I know. I often fear a nightmarish reality in which women spend minutes or even hours per day carefully disguising natural facial features, odors, and hair--or even exercising at a…
-
comment
Comment #2219126
I recommend The Red Queen if you want to start learning about this. The short answer: men largely choose mates based on looks; women choose based more on social status. Signalling …
-
comment
Comment #2214775
It is odd that you're demonizing Malcolm X and Steve Sailer, while refusing to address their arguments. Apparently they are "clumsy," "racist," and "grotesque," producing "simplifi…
-
comment
Comment #2214595
It's still ad hominem , even if it's also inductive reasoning. I'm still hoping for a follow-up addressing the claims, rather than the person making those claims.
-
comment
Comment #2214142
Has anyone disputed them? This seems like a great example of an ad hominem attack--you haven't had to question their data, or their logic, just the fact that they've found an argum…
-
comment
Comment #2214119
There is a big difference. You're a "supremacist" if you think one group is better. You're a "nationalist" if you think these groups should be separate. Many white nationalists wil…
-
comment
Comment #1883758
Would you laugh at someone who thought that it was a good thing for humans to selectively breed plants and animals? We certainly couldn't maintain our population without them. Woul…
-
comment
Comment #1883746
Okay, that's what I suspected. At the right level of abstraction, you can certainly find non-selfish activities. But a gene's-eye-view is the most significant view, because in the …
-
comment
Comment #1874162
Define "Selfishness" in this context. In a broad sense, it's very hard to argue that selfish genes don't explain most human behavior. Certainly, I would spend my time differently i…
-
comment
Comment #1874146
Conservatives say they don't believe in evolution, but act like they do (in the sense they tolerate "animal spirits" in economics, a sexual division of labor, and racial disparitie…
-
comment
Comment #1250047
That is definitely not an answer. Grandparent suggested that genetics plays a role in why people in one country are different from people in another. And you respond by saying that…
-
comment
Comment #1244909
You don't need to get drunk. Alcohol gradually reduces inhibitions, so if everyone has had a few drinks, they'll be able to sustain a conversation about, e.g., which project is act…
-
comment
Comment #1244654
Then you're not drinking enough. Seriously. Alcohol is a great evolutionary adaptation, since it allows people to be extremely dour and responsible most of the time, while being ab…
-
comment
Comment #1051786
I don't understand. That Time article is very clear about how beneficial European rule was. It goes on and on--about the mines and the industries and the shops and the general sens…
-
comment
Comment #1051137
If the smartest non-C programmers all started programming in C, and the C programmers never switched to something else, you could make that judgment. What's interesting is that I a…
-
comment
Comment #1050977
You know, their crime rate is amazingly low. Seriously, if you compare their numbers to the US, your first instinct is to assume that they moved the decimal point over. So it seems…
-
comment
Comment #1050807
The third-world isn't some laggard full of overbreeding simpletons. Any concrete reason for that belief? It looks like the "overbreeding" is objectively true: http://en.wikipedia.o…
-
comment
Comment #1050610
I recommend getting over it. You are almost certainly the descendants murderers and conquerors. http://www.exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=7819&... That's just how humans r…
-
comment
Comment #901035
Of course technical people would be the ones you find behind successful acts of destruction. But that does not mean that all engineering and hard-science types are more likely to b…
-
comment
Comment #901003
This seems like an incredibly poor idea. For whatever reason, people with engineering and hard-science backgrounds are much more likely to become terrorists ( http://www.theregiste…
-
comment
Comment #791545
(Based on my own anecdotal experience, rich people are not especially smarter than the poor or middle-class) IQ correlates better that parental socio-economic standing. But there a…
-
comment
Comment #791535
My impression was that it's pretty rare to move more than half a standard deviation by using test prep. And that median is skewed by the fact that scores fluctuate from one session…
-
comment
Comment #723825
Right. If you're okay with selling it in increments, but not selling all of it, there's probably a cutoff. And your cutoff is probably lower than 99%.
-
comment
Comment #723786
Of course it can be beneficial to slaves. If they're an asset, and the appreciation in that asset's value accrues mostly to the owner, that owner has every incentive to maximize th…