Viewing profile — _curious_
_curious_
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 3:35 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 72
- Public activity
- 398 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About _curious_
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #24803024
The author seems to be a good writer but it getting old hearing people wax poetic about their opinions on the valley - anyone got facts to support anything?
-
comment
Comment #23921960
allow me to clarify that by for free i meant cash/salary out of pocket
-
comment
Comment #23921326
I believe it, though there is plenty of opportunity for earned media - its not PR firm, ads, or nothing...
-
comment
Comment #23921317
Sounds like you have a high standard, as you should!
-
comment
Comment #23921278
"otherwise they are a founder and should be rewarded accordingly with equity." Of course - as they were. My point was on cash money comp. Never said they worked for free hence thei…
-
comment
Comment #23921277
Care to elaborate on what "rich with availability bias" means? I've never heard that one before. Also, the individual in reference wasn't the of the gender you're assuming.
-
comment
Comment #23918590
Agreed, it's not even about the money. My last company had a technical cofounder who by all means was highly sought after and managed a team of 15-20 other developers in their prim…
-
comment
Comment #23918506
It's the right idea but the wrong tool. Debt is actually the enemy of the founder/entrepreneur IMO...but building equity in yourself through moonlighting, side hustle, etc - is a b…
-
comment
Comment #23918439
For some founders & entrepreneurs, it forces them to work smarter - not necessarily harder - and that's the goal, to figure out what isn't working right and change it to reduce/eli…
-
comment
Comment #23918392
"You need the best PR firm you can get to return your calls." Saying someone "needs" something (ie paid PR) in order to succeed could also be deemed terrible advice.
-
comment
Comment #23918333
"You're going to end up with a bunch of rich white dudes as founders (because very, very obviously the other way that people can afford to take smaller checks is if they have a lot…
-
comment
Comment #23898459
Interesting thoughts Carol, thanks for sharing. It's important to have this sort of conversation with yourself when considering the foundations of starting a company. The fact that…
-
comment
Comment #23884010
"...I guess my point is, I think all I cared about was the geography and temperature profile, and the lifestyle the place would bring me. The actual company I'd work for came after…
-
comment
Comment #23863738
But isn't the chance implicitly always there?
-
comment
Comment #23863643
"most people want to do more than just get by" maybe so, maybe not? There's a massive gap between wanting something and doing what it takes to get it. If you were to ask people vs.…
-
comment
Comment #23859297
This is the second experiment/invention video of yours I've come across over the past year and equally enjoyable - keep up the great work!
-
comment
Comment #23850067
Over the past few years in tech, I have interacted with and observed (as a fly on the wall) a wide variety of recruiters, hiring managers, etc. from companies as small as a dozen (…
-
comment
Comment #23849955
"Most established professionals are not interested in a 10 week trial period after which they might be back on the job market." Why not? If the position isn't a fit for either side…
-
comment
Comment #23765298
I don't see why @IG_Semmelweiss comment here is dead, it's not wrong...banks were incentivized to provide capital to their highest debtors / longest clients who otherwise were at g…
-
comment
Comment #23765264
The issue with this line of thinking is that it doesn't end...until it does. Neither you nor I will likely be alive, but our children may very well be :/
-
comment
Comment #23765158
You're not wrong
-
comment
Comment #23765150
How does the invisible hand of the market determine "those who did not really need it" ?
-
comment
Comment #23765145
Some people - and the companies they operate - will, given the option, on principle, not take money which they have not earned. In the event that they did/do accept said money they…
-
comment
Comment #23763085
"but we can now keep an eye on those who did not really need it." Who's to say?
-
comment
Comment #23763069
So will your employer be paying the "loan" back?