Viewing profile — __jl__

Didn't expect that. Luna pricing is crazy now. I don't think there is anything on the market that competes at this price-performance point. For our production app, OpenAI clearly i…

This understates the cost increase. 3.5 Flash also uses more tokens. artificialanalysis.ai shows these difference to run the whole eval, which I think is more realistic pricing: Ge…

In our experience, caching is not very reliable with google. We always get random cache misses that don't happen with other providers. We find OpenAI, Anthropic and Fireworks (whic…

I see your point. I do find Anthropic's approach more clean though particularly when you add in mini and nano. That makes 5 models priced differently. Some share the same core name…

What a model mess! OpenAI now has three price points: GPT 5.1, GPT 5.2 and now GPT 5.4. There version numbers jump across different model lines with codex at 5.3, what they now cal…

Another preview release. Does that mean the recommended model by Google for production is 2.5 Flash and Pro? Not talking about what people are actually doing but the google recomme…

Impressive jump for GPT-5.3-codex and crazy to see two top coding models come out on the same day...

Yes you can and I really like it as a feature. But it ties you to OpenAI…

I will have to try that. Cursor bill got pretty high with Opus 4.5. Never considered opus before the 4.5 price drop but now it's hard to change... :)

Mostly at the time of release except for 1.5 Flash which got a price drop in Aug 2024. Google has been discontinuing older models after several months of transition period so I wou…

This is awesome. No preview release either, which is great to production. They are pushing the prices higher with each release though: API pricing is up to $0.5/M for input and $3/…

API pricing is up to $2/M for input and $12/M for output For comparison: Gemini 2.5 Pro was $1.25/M for input and $10/M for output Gemini 1.5 Pro was $1.25/M for input and $5/M for…

API pricing is up to $2/M for input and $12/M for output For comparison: Gemini 2.5 Pro was $1.25/M for input and $10/M for output Gemini 1.5 Pro was $1.25/M for input and $5/M for…

Same here. They have been aggressively increasing prices with each iteration (maybe because they started so low). Still hope that is not the case this time. GPT 5.1 is priced prett…

The prompt caching change is awesome for any agent. Claude is far behind with increased costs for caching and manual caching checkpoints. Certainly depends on your application but …

Since we have cursor people joining, let me bring up my constant problems around applying code changes. For background, I mostly work with "chat": 1. The apply button does not appe…

1.5 -> 2.0 was a price increase as well (double, I think, and something like 4x for image input) Now 2.0 -> 2.5 is another hefty price increase.

Same! :)

Voyage models are great in my experience and I am planing to test 3.5. Almost more interested in 3.5-lite though. Great price. My concern: voyage api has been unreliable. They were…

Thanks. I looked a couple minutes ago and couldn't see it. For anyone curious, pricing remains the same as previous Anthropic models.

Anyone found information on API pricing?

Here are my two cents on cursors versus windsurf approach: CURSOR shifted to a more agentic approach even for chat requests to reduce input tokens. Previously, they used the good o…

Only problem is that the genai API at https://ai.google.dev is far less reliable and can be problematic for production use cases. Right around the time Gemini 2.0 launched, it was …

I think the 9 billion is very misleading. More than half goes to hospitals affiliated with Harvard. I am not sure but I don't think they get anything from the endowment. The impact…

How does this compare with pg_search (formally pg_bm25) from ParadeDB?