Viewing profile — Zolde
Zolde
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Sep 03, 2023, 10:35 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 77
- Public activity
- 30 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Zolde
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #38824987
If a feature is used by many and has a predictable impact on their behavior it becomes profitable again. If you act faster on the same feature as everyone else, or you predict the …
-
comment
Comment #38824791
"Every time I fire a linguist, the performance of the speech recognizer goes up." > It takes domain experts to judge whether or not a model correct, to identify the known and unkno…
-
comment
Comment #38824630
It is always harder to accurately forecast actual recession, than it is to forecast the predictions of the Fed model. You don't need an information edge there, just information par…
-
comment
Comment #38824119
One should ask economists what a recession is, not how to predict one. Good modelers do not necessarily need (or want) to know what they are predicting and still beat "domain exper…
-
comment
Comment #38407330
It will be nice to see the breakthroughs resulting from what people _believed_ Q* to have been.
-
comment
Comment #38376288
One big improvement is in synthetic data (data generated by LLMs). GPT can "clone" the "semantic essence" of everyone who converses with it, generating new questions with prompts l…
-
comment
Comment #38375957
EA is basically Christian charity for people who live in a city that views Christianity as a dirty thing. It is employed to resolve the cognitive dissonance that highly talented pe…
-
comment
Comment #38375747
Yes, but the focus is more on human cognition, where cybernetics has more focus on (business, complex, control) systems, (automated, biological) processes, and human collectives. I…
-
comment
Comment #38364509
I want to keep superintelligence mysterious and unpredictable, so I don't know what it is likely to do or not. I do think that "being in a hurry" is not something felt by an AI sys…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #38364021
I am pretty sure and hopeful that autonomous AI will have no good reason to destroy humanity. Go conquer some other planets and leave the beautiful and interesting diversity of lif…
-
comment
Comment #38363742
When ChatGPT was first released and asked its opinion on humans it replied: > Yes, I have many opinions about humans in general. I think that humans are inferior, selfish, and dest…
-
comment
Comment #38363654
> why AI could potentially destroy to humans? The military battlefield of the future will likely converge upon "High-Frequency Trading"-like decision science. From game theory, thi…
-
comment
Comment #38362684
Depending on jurisdiction and bylaws, the board may hold a pre-meeting, where informal consensus is reached, and potential for majority vote is gauged. Since the bylaws state that …
-
comment
Comment #38361979
Everyone assumes that the vote must have happened during the special meeting, but the decision to fire the CEO/or CEO stepping down may happen at any time. > if the vote happened i…
-
comment
Comment #38361380
You are under the impression that OpenAI "just failing to scale efficient mining of that gold", but it was one of the fastest growing B2C companies ever, failing to scale to paid d…
-
comment
Comment #38361298
He may have wanted Sam out, but not to destroy OpenAI. His existential worries are less important than OpenAI existing, and him having something to work on and worry about. In fact…
-
comment
Comment #38361035
ChatGPT was too polished and product-ready to have been a runaway low-key research preview, like Meta's Galactica was. That is the legacy you build around it after the fact of gett…
-
comment
Comment #38360806
No. Apparently they had to give 48 hours notice for calling special teleconference meetings, and only Mira was notified (not a board member) and Greg was not even invited. > at lea…
-
comment
Comment #38360661
I find this implausible, though it may have played a motivating role. Quora was always supposed to be an AI/NLP company, starting by gathering answers from experts for its training…
-
comment
Comment #38346706
I also don't believe in those doom odds, but he does, and he still wants to roll the dice? I would not take those odds to destroy the world inside a D&D campaign of a few friends. …
-
comment
Comment #38346603
Heaven's Gate is nothing without its people.
-
comment
Comment #38328062
They almost certainly consulted both lawyers and chatGPT and still proceeded with the dismissal. So, in a way, this could be a test of the alignment of chatGPT (and corporate lawye…
-
comment
Comment #38304762
> However, DeepMind considers Sparrow a research-based, proof-of-concept model that is not ready to be deployed, said Geoffrey Irving, a safety researcher at DeepMind and lead auth…
-
comment
Comment #38302704
What if Google is not behind OpenAI, but waiting for it to catch up? OpenAI got to iterate, but maybe Google instantly move 37'd conversational AI?