Viewing profile — Zinggi
Zinggi
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 9:43 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 23
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Zinggi
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36059258
Pretty sure you mean this one: https://thedailywtf.com/articles/The-Speedup-Loop
-
comment
Comment #22892855
In JS, my preferred way of handling json is heavily inspired by the elm json decoding way. I want my decoders to essentially do 2 things: 1. Transform received data into a data str…
-
comment
Comment #22890748
You shouldn't validate json. You should parse it, e.g. transform it into your desired data structure if it comes in in a valid shape. https://lexi-lambda.github.io/blog/2019/11/05/…
-
comment
Comment #22881356
You might be interested in lamdera. It abstracts away database access, data transport and data encoding between client end server. Here is a talk about it: https://www.youtube.com/…
-
comment
Comment #22825529
Thank you! Well put.
-
comment
Comment #17305658
> the Android app requires no device permissions That's not true, it just uses the new way to ask for permissions. E.g. when you want to scan a QR code it requires the camera permi…
-
comment
Comment #17302537
Yep, from a user perspective it definitely looks like 2FA. In terms of technology it's of course completely different.
-
comment
Comment #17302520
Ah ok, got it. If you are already using KeePass than there is no reason to use NoKey, KeePass is great! > Not everyone has a million devices. I don't think that's fair. With 3 devi…
-
comment
Comment #17302205
But wouldn't you agree that your brain + NoKey instead of a piece of paper as a backup would be more secure? And more convenient, as you don't have to type your passwords anymore. …
-
comment
Comment #17301838
Exactly. Or even 3 if you make use of security level 3. The only exception is at the start when there are no passwords stored yet.
-
comment
Comment #17301693
When pairing a new device (or in this case a new browser), that device doesn't automatically get any keys! When adding a new device, to complete the setup you also have to be able …
-
comment
Comment #17301229
Yes, but it's a very bad idea. If you'd do this, you could unlock your passwords with a single device by confirming on Firefox or vice-versa on Chrome. This of course also means th…
-
comment
Comment #17296007
Oh, than I misunderstood, sorry. You're absolutely correct.
-
comment
Comment #17295966
Thanks. I was always wondering why others don't do this more often. I find it much easier to remember and type in a few words compared to a long number.
-
comment
Comment #17295886
> Doesn't this increase your attack surface greatly though? That's true. I suppose it's a trade off between protection against lost vs. smaller attack surface. > Since there's no m…
-
comment
Comment #17293815
You lose access to your passwords, that's the consequence of that approach. That's why it's a very good idea to pair as many devices as you can, e.g. an old phone, your work PC, et…
-
comment
Comment #17291993
Hi all! This is my first time posting something to HN, so please be kind. I wanted to show what I’ve been working on for the last 6 months: NoKey, a password manager without a mast…
- story