Viewing profile — Zalastax
Zalastax
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 19, 2015, 10:41 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 213
- Public activity
- 118 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Zalastax
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #38386230
I would also like to understand better. But it seems like it is visual effects that is meant. These tools were mentioned by name: https://www.kabaretstudio.com/ https://prism-pipel…
-
comment
Comment #37573551
Is there not full or at least partial overlap between the 44 % and the 26 %? Which would mean not 70 % but some smaller number?
-
comment
Comment #33582036
Euclidean rythms are well supported in the Tidal Cycles family of live programming environments. Here's a demo that you can play with online: https://strudel.tidalcycles.org?fTGy0e…
-
comment
Comment #33006420
Interesting! I suppose one could prepare for that by having a second profile with just a few questions solved?
-
comment
Comment #30692741
You may find my MsC thesis, link in profile, interesting! If I remember my writing correctly, I have similar reflections on CSP.
-
comment
Comment #29679060
My view on 2 is that you get into a quite different mindset when you program actors, compared to objects. For starters, since each actor is scheduled separately, it becomes routine…
-
comment
Comment #24281198
Natural body of water!
-
comment
Comment #23562221
Yes, it's super difficult to limit the receiving end. If you use a mailbox type, it quickly needs to handle basically all shapes of data. Session types or similar are needed to get…
-
comment
Comment #22897624
We're working on a gradual type system for Erlang which also works quite okay for Elixir: https://github.com/josefs/Gradualizer/ .
-
comment
Comment #22496420
A pretty simple program that fools your brain is one testing the Collatz conjecture: https://cs.stackexchange.com/a/44875 Or did you mean something else?
-
comment
Comment #22317214
Totally agree. I think that locality is what separates true functional programming from languages where some of functional programming features have been added on top. Immutability…
-
comment
Comment #19030302
Sure, but my point still stands: figuring this out doesn't require arcane knowledge, contrary to what was suggested. The code inside the expression looks like standard JS. The down…
-
comment
Comment #19028034
It looks like fairly standard JS to me. I don't know where to read about it but there are some details on the deprecation blog article: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ie/2008/10/…
-
comment
Comment #18623140
But that's not how one should read "that is". The author should have used "e.g." here, no question. Using "i.e." would imply that there exists only one nondeterministic function in…
-
comment
Comment #18622503
I touched on this in my MSc thesis [1], see section 2.6 and 3.4.1. The original CSP can only work if you stay on a single machine. You can have channels in a distributed setting bu…
-
comment
Comment #18559793
We're adressing the lack of static typing with the Gradualizer project. It's not ready for prime time yet but I find it very promising. https://github.com/josefs/Gradualizer
-
comment
Comment #18334454
Your point still stands but, since the field has so many terminologies that are conflated, I wanted to let you know that "active objects" is a specific kind of actor model and Erla…
-
comment
Comment #18317622
Sure,and lots of codebases are completely untyped. I find it great that you can opt out of the theorem proving that type checking is when crunch time comes. As such it functions as…
-
comment
Comment #18315258
I instead proclaim that it brings you the best of both worlds. Finding the right mix of static/dymamic is a balance act but if you do so you get the benefits of static types (safet…
-
comment
Comment #18312995
Gradualizer supports Elixir. It will move into beta soonish :)
-
comment
Comment #18296859
You want reproducibility, the results will be affected a lot by your data source, real citations enable tools like google scholar. Why not cite? I see only drawbacks in continuing …
-
comment
Comment #18296778
Can you expand on what you mean? What is "the matrix model of computation" and "vectors of unity"? Which actor model are you talking about? The variants are very different and Hewi…
-
comment
Comment #18296513
It's the frequency illusion (also known as the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon). https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion
-
comment
Comment #18214234
They are very useful if you follow the philosophy of Erlang: let it crash. It's really important to get easy to understand distributed systems. A good introduction: https://learnyo…
-
comment
Comment #18214220
As far as I know Pony doesn't yet have a distribution story so supervision might not be priority for the maintainers yet. However, since Pony is an "Active Objects"-language, every…