Viewing profile — ZGDUwpqEWpUZ
ZGDUwpqEWpUZ
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 11, 2020, 8:26 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 292
- Public activity
- 111 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ZGDUwpqEWpUZ
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35667229
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #35407376
I didn't choose 15 at random. It's unclear why you think putting words in my mouth is going to achieve anything. ICOs don't need any special regulations, existing contract law is f…
-
comment
Comment #35404540
It was a genuine question, and from your response I'm guessing the answer is "no". If you're wondering what provoked the question, it was the crying about "unregistered" ICOs - at …
-
comment
Comment #35402271
Are you older than 15?
-
comment
Comment #35264676
Were you using SMS 2FA? Probably related to this: https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2023/an-update...
-
comment
Comment #35192230
Women Are Wonderful. I prefer explanations that fit observed behaviour - men take larger overdoses, and neither a propensity for violence nor a higher tolerance for messiness can e…
-
comment
Comment #35190787
Men kill themselves more even if you only look at intentional overdoses, which are about as non-violent as you can get. Older women also take larger overdoses than younger women - …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35061601
$100m seems to be a made up number.
-
comment
Comment #34990599
Saagar is a male forename, but yes, reducing kidnapping to "losing your wallet" in an attempt at whataboutery is a bit tasteless.
-
comment
Comment #34859415
apt handles this by marking packages as manually installed. You and the author could both be happy with that solution but afaik pip doesn't currently store such information.
-
comment
Comment #34783031
That part about child pornography was a bit...weird. Am I misreading it or is the author suggesting children can consent?
-
comment
Comment #34237258
> the manosphere You're talking in circles here - you brought up what "sort of person" is in the manosphere, and your answer is people in the manosphere. Not exactly insightful. Th…
-
comment
Comment #34235171
> just popular among the same sort of people. Which I think you'd have a hard time denying. I'd have a hard time denying it because I have no idea what that "sort of person" is eve…
-
comment
Comment #34234747
I didn't. I gave a concrete example of the phenomenon I was already talking about. If he wants to give concrete examples of what he's talking about, he's more than welcome to do th…
-
comment
Comment #34234575
https://www.vox.com/2019/5/20/18629644/abortion-gender-gap-p...
-
comment
Comment #34234470
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #34234048
Kindly visit the Men's Rights Movement wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement Go through the issues in the second section and tell me what Andrew Tate's p…
-
comment
Comment #34233357
To be clear, you believe the Global Boyhood Initiative, who published that report, are an extreme minority, and are accusing me of a fallacy because of that? Fascinating. This is e…
-
comment
Comment #34233166
In my experience, what you're saying is complete nonsense. Feminists spend much more time lying about men's issues than they do attempting to meaningfully rectify them. Even a simp…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33945155
Accusing someone of deliberately derailing a conversation when they're doing no such thing is obviously going to be taken as an insult. You can question the relevance of a comparis…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33843458
Parental controls are now the default on (most?) UK mobile providers, so a lot of archive/user-driven sites get blocked if you don't login to your provider's portal to tick the "I'…
-
comment
Comment #33841764
"Disseminate" is not the word you're looking for there.