Viewing profile — YmiYugy
YmiYugy
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 14, 2020, 3:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 496
- Public activity
- 168 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About YmiYugy
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49233786
I find the title highly misleading. The actual claim is a 40% lower chance (1 in 100 as opposed to 1 in 60) for taxi and ambulance drivers when compared to the average. That’s a bi…
-
comment
Comment #49150039
IMHO the output is bad enough that I can't imagine a use case for illustrations of this kind.
-
comment
Comment #49147636
I don't think it's a bad way to benchmark new models, I just find it concerning that the author implies that "pelican on a bicycle" has been exhausted. At the risk of making overly…
-
comment
Comment #49077216
I remain skeptical of that line of reasoning. 1. There is quite the mania right now and security layers are definitely overzealous. I would expect that to get better with some more…
-
comment
Comment #49076755
Yeah, seems pretty likely. Anthropic will make the case that their models should be evaluated with the safety layer in front, because that is the only way the model is available wh…
-
comment
Comment #48980705
I think it’s death by a thousand cuts. I think internet connections are the least of the issue. Plenty of people have gaming PCs wired to 1Gb/s fiber. It may even be better because…
-
comment
Comment #48980308
I don’t think there is a ton of spare capacity. But even if there was the machines are designed for AI not gaming, e.g. low CPU clocks, the GPUs don’t have RT cores or video encode…
-
comment
Comment #48913755
Seeing a comparison of different Wayland compositors could be very interesting.
-
comment
Comment #48715708
But SOTA models used liberally at API pricing is a lot more than $10/hour. You can probably burn $100+/hour with just a single agent, and probably thousands when running agents pro…
-
comment
Comment #48715667
I’m writing a lot of React code and find that the cheaper models are pretty terrible. Maybe I’m holding it wrong but the experience that the cheaper model is usually enough just tr…
-
comment
Comment #48469160
Makes me wonder, as people grow to trust the AI more and more, not reading the code and barely skimming the implementation plans and simply rerolling if something doesn't work, wil…
-
comment
Comment #48154070
Getting users to open a message isn’t a terribly high bar. As a user I would not find it acceptable if needed to be careful with which message I open. We tried putting the responsi…
-
comment
Comment #48065476
AI or not, it’s always been reasonable common that a bunch of related vulnerabilities get discovered after shortly after the original one.
-
comment
Comment #47879286
So according to the benchmarks somewhere in between Opus 4.7 and Mythos
-
comment
Comment #47860955
Because judging failure is itself a complex task requiring a potentially expensive model.
-
comment
Comment #47860943
Of course you don't NEED the better models, but figuring out what model you need can waste a lot of time and effort. Even when a cheap model is capable of a task it needs a lot mor…
-
comment
Comment #47860882
1. They heavily subsidized their plans vs. paying for API. 2. They allowed me to use the subscription in every tool I wanted. 3. It covered both Anthropic and OpenAI.
-
comment
Comment #47860851
That seems not possible.
-
comment
Comment #47860734
Yes, please! But browsers need to make it easier for things to exist in user space. That means reviving CSS Houdini, particularly reviving the animation and layout worklets. (It go…
-
comment
Comment #47860679
I tried to use and found it to be a pain. I wanted to close it when clicking outside, but Safari doesn't support closedBy. Some Safari versions on iOS broke when trying to style my…
-
comment
Comment #47860611
I think cutting the legacy and doing things with the benefit of hindsight would make for a much nicer platform. For example something like CSS Houdini (making CSS extensible) might…
-
comment
Comment #47860567
1. I think it's pretty clear that the frameworks sold themselves, because it's possible to see the DX benefits with anything beyond a hello world. You don't need Meta's scale. It c…
-
comment
Comment #47860120
There are proposals with some traction that would enable webbrowsers to parse TS, but simply ignore the types. I think it's a bad idea, because tooling handles that perfectly well …
-
comment
Comment #47860093
I think it's totally fair, but I would assume that most Spring projects make significant DX tradeoffs compared to a full JS stack or serve an API rather than html. 1. Spring + Hand…
-
comment
Comment #47859880
The article lists, things like transpilers, polyfills, tree shaking, minification, CSS transformation, then declares that this is all super complex and that we need to start over. …