Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Xk

Xk

HN member
Joined
Fri, Aug 20, 2010, 3:26 PM UTC
HN karma
1,020
Public activity
209 items

About Xk

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #5457024

    You would think that it would. But the way Chrome has implemented CSP, it doesn't. When you specify a CSP in a Chrome extension, it applies to the core extension (the background pa…

  2. comment
    Comment #5456978

    There's been a lot of research about this recently (I've brought this up on HN previously). A team from Berkeley broke 50% of the 50 most popular extensions last year [1]. Some oth…

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #4877828

    Those interested in this should look at a paper from Vern Paxon and Nicholas Weaver: http://www.icir.org/vern/papers/witty-imc05.pdf A summary of it: A worm used a linear congenita…

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #4059284

    Thanks. Will do. edit: support email sent

  7. comment
    Comment #4059274

    You have a very severe security vulnerability on your site. Please provide an email address in your info I can contact you at. (The email field is hidden to others.) Edit: interwho…

  8. comment
    Comment #3779168

    Either you do it for everything, or you do it for only POST and you end up missing half of the vulnerabilities. Correct me if I'm wrong, but your CSRF attack used a GET request, di…

  9. comment
    Comment #3779155

    CSRF is NOT a browser vulnerability. The browser is doing exactly what it's supposed to do: load content. The browser can not (and should not) attempt to identify the "evil" HTTP r…

  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #3715761

    Researchers at UC Berkeley studied this exact question. About 40% of extensions contain at least one injection vulnerability. Some really popular extensions were vulnerable -- even…

  12. comment
    Comment #3374439

    There is an XSS on pen.io. I posted this a while ago, but feint didn't fix it. http://xssdemo.pen.io Suggestion: It is very hard to allow HTML but remove JavaScript. Write a method…

  13. comment
    Comment #3207719

    Please don't use this for passwords. Security is very hard to get right. Do they do a secure delete of the contents of the webpages? Who knows. Do they have strong physical protect…

  14. comment
    Comment #2865465

    No. If an attacker gets access to the database, chances are very very good they can get access to the key as well. Very few services correctly separate privileges well enough that …

  15. comment
    Comment #2839708

    Fine. Assume it's one bit per voxel. 512 petabits = 2 petabytes. So only 2 petabytes of data. I'd like to see the server that processed those 2 petabytes. Notch also points out tha…

  16. comment
    Comment #2790604

    That's not the case. Each Telex Station has it's own private key which it uses to decrypt the 224 bit tag. If one Telex station loses its private key, then the user will just use a…

  17. comment
    Comment #2788214

    Yeah, I realize that -- I'm just saying, for people who want to read more on the subject of Tetris there is a lot out there.

  18. comment
    Comment #2788182

    For those that care, a few years ago some researchers proved Tetris is NP-complete for many problems. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.CC/0210020

  19. comment
    Comment #2777023

    They have an XSS on https://secure.trust-guard.com/ (enter a username like -- yes, it won't work with chrome's XSS filter)... somehow I'm inclined to believe they are not so great.…

  20. comment
    Comment #2756694

    The current implementation uses an iframe and so they can't read the data out of the iframe (same-origin policy). This would require injecting javascript on to news.ycombinator.com…

  21. comment
    Comment #2755879

    The problem with captchas is they have to be readable to humans. Sure, a captcha of "lI0Ol1o" would would probably be unreadable to a computer ... but it would be to a human too. W…

  22. comment
    Comment #2755451

    Alright; I'm confused. First they say that they "generate around 1 petabyte of data per second" Then they say "ATLAS produces up to 320M bytes per second, followed by CMS with 220M…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #2717024

    No. Not at all. If someone managed to break in to your website and get the password hashes, chances are they also have your "secret" salt. There is no reason to separate the salt f…

  25. comment
    Comment #2716953

    It is true that scrypt is better than bcrypt, but the transition from salt+SHA-1 to bcrypt is significatnly better than from bcrypt to scrypt, and scrypt doesn't have nearly as nic…