Viewing profile — XaYdEk
XaYdEk
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 27, 2016, 12:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 45
- Public activity
- 41 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About XaYdEk
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #12848910
You implement security in order to have privacy and I agree it's poorly understood in the digital realm, mostly because it's "out of sight and out of mind". I like to use an analog…
-
comment
Comment #12848475
Ok, I am aware of how it works, but I'm not talking pentests or hardening. I'm talking simple, cheap design choices in this case, that could've eliminated the whole Mirai debaucher…
-
comment
Comment #12846316
How many pennies would've been needed to insert a simple page forcing you to change user/password combo and to choose a reasonably strong password after first boot ? In the case of…
-
comment
Comment #12846236
Amen, the Security Industry is doing great, security is doing poorly.
-
comment
Comment #12846187
But when you tell someone "That's not secure, you can easily get hacked. You need to [insert good security practices here]", what response do you get ? In my experience, most answe…
-
comment
Comment #12845941
By sending binary SMSs. There are multiple classes of SMS, including binary messages through which operators can access and change data directly on your SIM. Since that's also your…
-
comment
Comment #12845562
Was wondering how long it took for someone to catch that. :)
-
comment
Comment #12845164
Call it VeraCrypt, because TrueCrypt is dead now.
-
comment
Comment #12842463
His defense will be that he never had criminal intention, that it was an unfortunate accident, that can be chalked up to inexperience and curiosity. That he didn't take measures to…
-
comment
Comment #12841560
Like any new technology early adopters pay way more, because economies of scale have yet to be achieved. Musk knows this, same with Tesla, he is marketing to a high-income target m…
-
comment
Comment #12841322
You mean this: https://github.com/psal/anonymouth Yes, it apparently is, we have a lot of personal tells.
-
comment
Comment #12840802
Facepalm. Damn kids, they're all alike ...
-
comment
Comment #12840651
The language is intentionally crap. Attribution is always difficult.
-
comment
Comment #12837961
To go with Lemmy "Regrets are always late and usually pointless" and to go with Frank "... I have a few, but then again too few to mention", except 1. not marrying her.
-
comment
Comment #12837635
Would you like to come up and see my etchings ? Better still, stay here and I'll bring them down. :)
-
comment
Comment #12837605
I feel like I might really dive into this conversation. Technically feasible, yes, agreed. The simulations tell us this much, that at point T+x, we could have a green electricity g…
-
comment
Comment #12835706
Will use this as a referencem good article.
-
comment
Comment #12835560
Technically yes, economically difficult for most nations, if it's approached at this level. Germany has had an interesting approach to solar, where they subsidized solar panels for…
-
comment
Comment #12833972
Solar and wind based energy production is not going to fully or even mostly replace our gas/coal burners because they lack constant and predictable outputs. Also, we have neither i…
-
comment
Comment #12833837
It's not an ad litteram translation, but we will still obviously lose some of the more subtle linguistics.
-
comment
Comment #12833818
Yes it is. He means the Chinese 'equivalent' which is called Weibo.
-
comment
Comment #12833784
It would seem so, wouldn't it ? But changing a Constitution would at least require a validation from their Suprene Court in terms of structure and adherence to legal principles. Co…
-
comment
Comment #12833693
I would disagree, I think it's a label attached to those people that actively attempt to influence policy making on behalf of their client's interests. Just offering specialized in…
-
comment
Comment #12833621
Ah, reality is an infinite source of irony.
-
comment
Comment #12833556
'If you're reading this, then you'll probably end up in an owner shell at some point' ... Am I that transparent ?