Viewing profile — XMPPwocky
XMPPwocky
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jul 27, 2015, 5:46 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,593
- Public activity
- 495 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About XMPPwocky
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48858339
Why?
-
comment
Comment #48664093
> This was their third office space, serving as their headquarters before they outgrew it and eventually relocated to Market Square at 1355 Market Street in 2012. The arab spring t…
-
comment
Comment #48638910
For what it's worth, this sounds a lot like something downstream from "reward hacking" in ML- in training, passing tests is often sufficient, and thus gets trained for. There are a…
-
comment
Comment #48573421
Why is something being human or not relevant here?
-
comment
Comment #48076579
> The difference is that when a human reasoner goes to solve a problem, they'll think "this kind of proof usually goes this way" - following an explicit rule enforcement. How is th…
-
comment
Comment #47993710
Hm, say more about what your opinion's based on here?
-
comment
Comment #47993703
Hm, it sounds like to you consciousness implies non-determinism, and so determinism implies a lack of consciousness - is that right? If so, why do you think so? And if not, what am…
-
comment
Comment #47992200
Yup- the question is "can math be conscious?" (If you've engaged w/ the literature here, it's quite hard to give a confident "yes". it's also quite hard to give a confident "no"! s…
-
comment
Comment #47222759
Presumably the decryption key is in the firmware.
-
comment
Comment #45485770
I also can't help but note that this blog post itself seems (first to my own intuition and heuristics, but also to both Pangram and GPTZero) to be clearly LLM-generated text.
-
comment
Comment #45416550
nit: assuming you mean basis points, one basis point is 0.01%. 4.5bp would be 72.7% to 72.71%. this is 450bp!
-
comment
Comment #44678207
How is it a black box? You can get the firmware trivially.
-
comment
Comment #43073486
I think your pitch would be significantly stronger if the resources you linked didn't largely revolve around "What if Snoop Dogg had his own currency?" I'm not ... completely unabl…
-
comment
Comment #41389356
What makes you say that? Have you read serious arguments against this view (ideally from academic philosophers, not somebody like me on HN!)?
-
comment
Comment #41386646
> IGN has accused the game developer for being sexist (based on some poorly translated social media posts) and gave it a low score before properly playing/testing it. What score di…
-
comment
Comment #41385828
Could you be more specific? What underclass (and why don't they matter?), and what segregation?
-
comment
Comment #41372630
Experts in any field are generally not the ones communicating with, and making recommendations to, the public.
-
comment
Comment #41339682
" by the same people that believe whatever they're told by anyone in authority, and then feel the urge to pass it on to others without critical thought." respectfully, what the hel…
-
comment
Comment #41306915
In fact, humans will be running at relativistic speeds within this century, risking the total destruction of the Earth if they should ever trip over something and fall down. Scary …
-
comment
Comment #41260293
Absolutely agree. When I was a kid, I took a MOOC (MITx 6.002x) because I was interested in EE. They said calculus was a prerequisite, which I didn't know yet, but I went ahead any…
-
comment
Comment #41260232
The existence of sentient AGIs would certainly have wide-ranging impacts on the law! This case is not about sentient AGIs.
-
comment
Comment #41213373
But bigger fixed-length instructions mean more I$ pressure, right?
-
comment
Comment #41196896
What stops an attacker from uploading their own firmware that dumps out everything in OTP?
-
comment
Comment #41166216
I have UI to enter a custom URL for search in Firefox for Android, with no extensions beyond Privacy Badger, Unhook, and uBlock Origin- interesting.
-
comment
Comment #41163501
Are the activation functions truly different, or just different parameter values to one underlying function?