Viewing profile — Wonderfall
Wonderfall
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 25, 2022, 12:40 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 46
- Public activity
- 30 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Wonderfall
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43300565
I do actually read a lot about LLM interpretability, and this is my own conclusion (should've phrased it like "they don't seem to have"). I do actually consider this an open questi…
-
comment
Comment #43292263
> From your article and comments, it sounds like the take is something like "humans don't actually reason autoregressively" which could be true, I don't know enough to know, but so…
-
comment
Comment #43291912
I admit my phrasing was poor there, and I got too excited. I will clarify since I don't really disagree with you or what others said (claiming it's the best way is an overstatement…
-
comment
Comment #43291695
This is mainly a misunderstanding due to the way I phrased it. This is what I think. I know for a fact that is the case for other AI researchers having watched many conferences - "…
-
comment
Comment #43290084
I come from a medical science background, where I studied the brain from a "traditional" neuroscience perspective (biology, pathology, anatomy, psychology and whatnot). That the be…
-
comment
Comment #43290029
I completely agree. I never said that "intelligence cannot be auto-regressive", I just questioned whether this can be achieved or not this way. And I don't actually have answers, I…
-
comment
Comment #43289991
LeCun is for sure a source of inspiration, and I think he has a fair critique that still holds true despite what people think when they see reasoning models in action. But I don't …
-
comment
Comment #43289984
Yeah, this is mentioned in the article. (The LLaDa paper is even what triggered its writing!)
-
comment
Comment #43289982
I guess semantics matter. Language is primarily hierarchical, but its presentation is what's linear. And LLMs mainly learn and work from this presentation; the question is, and one…
-
comment
Comment #43289952
> There's not much signal here, just basic facts about LLMs and then leaps to very bold statements. The article wasn't supposed to be informative for people who already know how LL…
-
comment
Comment #43244375
Author here and I welcome the feedback, but I don't really understand your point. My post is clearly not dismissive of efforts to make LLMs reason using CoT prompting techniques an…
- story
-
comment
Comment #30519253
Unsure why you think the storage access framework doesn't let you grant access to a directory. You can literally try it on a relatively modern app such as Lemuroid: the system file…
-
comment
Comment #30516928
Stock OS ships security updates on the latest major version. It means that you can only get a given patch level on the same version for a given device. CalyxOS wasn't rebased on An…
-
comment
Comment #30514021
Once again, these management features don't expect an app to bypass the trust boundaries by allowing the user to arbitrarily add repositories. There is a to-be-exposed toggle that …
-
comment
Comment #30510423
Sounds like a you problem: https://developer.android.com/reference/com/google/android/t... https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/UserManag... You're welcome to search …
-
comment
Comment #30510228
Any regular app can be considered an installer. Such APIs like the one controlled by requireUserAction which allows seamless app updates since Android 12 are declared in the app in…
-
comment
Comment #30510063
This paper is not exhaustive and there is further documentation on the APIs in question on the Android official website. You can easily guess the problem involved with the security…
-
comment
Comment #30509995
You misunderstood what they said. Indeed, Android can have multiple app repositories and this is an integral part of its security model design. However, for the security model to b…
-
comment
Comment #30470100
Well, surely there are biases in some ways, including some I may not even be conscious of. That being said, I try to follow a fact-based approach: yes, the conclusion is biased in …
-
comment
Comment #30469021
> False dichotomy. I still have the sandbox with F-Droid. This is chaff. I didn't imply that you wouldn't benefit from the app sandbox by using F-Droid. I meant that the practical …
-
comment
Comment #30468826
Thanks for the heads-up! It's also a new account since I've never posted on HN before, so maybe that's why. (Also I would like to correct myself on my previous comment: I meant "GP…
-
comment
Comment #30468652
Sorry, of course meant GPG, OpenPGP being the standard on which GPG is based on.
-
comment
Comment #30467483
Funny you should mention NewPipe since they discourage users from relying on the official F-Droid repo for the very reason of slow updates, which you don't want for an app relying …
-
comment
Comment #30467397
> because there are no restrictions on things that just work with root, donation links for open source open geo data contribution platforms[1], roll your own payment scheme without…