Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — WindowsDev

WindowsDev

HN member
Joined
Thu, Mar 27, 2025, 1:18 AM UTC
HN karma
5
Public activity
21 items

About WindowsDev

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43753545

    Thanks for your feedback. The source code for my windows binary projects(and visual studio .SLN files too) are available for all my projects if you care to look close enough. The .…

  2. comment
    Comment #43753451

    Actually, you presumed correctly. I plan to take requests in the future and I am releasing some stuff to establish my background before I start on freelancing sites. Nothing is set…

  3. comment
    Comment #43744426

    >The file size doesn't need to be small for Github, they don't care. Likewise it doesn't need to be small for the extension since the extension is stored locally, not loaded over t…

  4. comment
    Comment #43744131

    [flagged]

  5. comment
    Comment #43743974

    >that the same code has previously been show to include malware. What was pointed out was, that the extension got compromised at our thereafter December 2024. The version I base th…

  6. comment
    Comment #43743931

    FYI your link says "In December 2024, a threat actor conducted a software supply chain attack using compromised developer accounts to distribute malicious browser extension updates…

  7. comment
    Comment #43743537

    Congrats, you sewed enough paranoia that you got the submission taken down just suspicion alone. Strange though, on a community of developers, no one is able to show specifically h…

  8. comment
    Comment #43743519

    Threat Intelligence Match Analysis: Malicious Extension Heuristic vs. Your Extension You're referencing a known malicious pattern described in GitLab’s Feb 2025 bulletin. Let's bre…

  9. comment
    Comment #43743411

    Typically the burden of proof would be on the one making the assertion that something is malicious, but I see mere accusations and paranoia is good enough for some people even with…

  10. comment
    Comment #43743320

    I removed that reference to the developer's old domain in the latest commit. Analysis: echnical Fact Pattern 1. Yes, it does contain: js Copy Edit const UNINSTALL_URL = " https://s…

  11. comment
    Comment #43743301

    I was transparent about the origins of where this code came from. If you think there is malicious behavior, point it out and we will kindly update the code to remove it. The refere…

  12. comment
  13. comment
    Comment #43743194

    The readme says its a fork of Super Dark Mode, which might of turned became associated with malware after getting bought out or hacked by the original owners. >We assess that the t…

  14. comment
    Comment #43743141

    It currently does not, just handles applying a uniform black theme across all domains. Good suggestion though, I will look into implementing this today. (My idea is, to use a custo…

  15. comment
    Comment #43743125

    [flagged]

  16. comment
    Comment #43743111

    Excuse me? I'm re-releasing a bunch of tools I had for my own use over the years, which either got taken down or otherwise.

  17. comment
    Comment #43743093

    That React stuff is for the interface. It contains transpiled "minified" code so to cut back on the file size. If you want to untangle it and reconstruct the sources for it feel fr…

  18. story
  19. story
    Release: OLED Mode extension for Chrome

    I made this for my own personal usage because Dark Reader stinks. Let me know what you think.

  20. comment
    Comment #43691801

    Is the source code which leaked everything one would need to host their own copy of the site?

  21. story