Viewing profile — Wilder7977
Wilder7977
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 07, 2024, 9:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 172
- Public activity
- 103 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Wilder7977
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49219520
What does socialism have to do with universal health care? For someone who is making a point of using correct terminology this seems really strange. Universal healthcare is a polic…
-
comment
Comment #48434375
Using GenAI on things that you couldn't approach is also extremely scary and dangerous in my opinion. For example, I would never in a million years use generated code I don't under…
-
comment
Comment #48322537
Apparently yes, judging from the fact that ChatGPT did that with a number of people. My question though it's another: is it malware a software that does a stdout print, or is it ma…
-
comment
Comment #48320638
I think this is an interesting (although philosophical debate). The library doesn't take destructive actions, it prints a string that says "go do something". This is quite common i…
-
comment
Comment #48190206
Anyone physically near your house can just see you leaving the house and know you are not at home, besides all the other signs. There is no control against this, and it shouldn't b…
-
comment
Comment #48073311
Yes, correct. Is the distinction between human labor/actions and a program executing hard to grasp? Moral is a human thing, not an absolute thing, so of course it's different if th…
-
comment
Comment #48059303
So no external libraries for anything? Billions of lines of code that duplicate the same thing n-times across an organization? And the benefit is the obscurity of "no one will know…
-
comment
Comment #47988727
It's not though. It's still just a piece of code, much closer to IDEs or any other program than to a human assistant in any way that matters (morals, responsibility).
-
comment
Comment #47715873
Aerospace makes my Mac usable, but it is a looooong way from what i3 offers in my experience. i3 is way snappier, super stable, with good features out-of-the-box (including a statu…
-
comment
Comment #47305706
This seems completely detached from reality. For example it ignores the gazillion medium(-like) "articles" that are not much more than the output of a prompt. Here AI is not about …
-
comment
Comment #47286569
Democratizing? A handful of companies harvesting data and building products on top of it is democratizing? Open research papers, that everyone can access is democratizing knowledge…
-
comment
Comment #47216598
I am on e/OS since 2021 with a FP3 and, for what is worth, I never had to reinstall, wipe or anything. My phone just had it's 5th birthday and it has been a single continuous set o…
-
comment
Comment #47100873
My wife works for a competitor of the company mentioned. They are in EU. Still run everything on AWS. The data collected is usually even more than what stated, full video recording…
-
comment
Comment #47084558
77.500 channels which make any money. Now plenty of those make a handful of dollars per month. Also, 77k worldwide. I am not going to deny that YouTube (and all social media) creat…
-
comment
Comment #47076730
There are no such detailed numbers as far as I know. No platform (twitch, YouTube etc.) generally provides this information. Thinking bad one could assume it's because most people …
-
comment
Comment #47072471
The journalism one is really a great example I did not think about. I understand there is an argument to be made about what is the "value" of things, but for me it's quite clear th…
-
comment
Comment #47071636
https://alanspicer.com/what-percentage-of-youtubers-make-mon... Claims 0.25% of channels makes any money at all. The amount that make a decent living is realistically even smaller,…
-
comment
Comment #47071617
And if it's so cheap and bespoke, why buying it and not making it in house? What about access to people with know-how of that product? You use a product that only 4 other companies…
-
comment
Comment #47071568
YouTube is a platform, it's not a product. And in this case, created a new market. A market in which, by the way, still very few people (relative to those who try) are successful. …
-
comment
Comment #47060025
And those companies will do what? Produce products in uber-saturated markets? Or magically 9900 more products or markets will be created, all of them successful?
-
comment
Comment #47058330
Plus, a core part of what qualifies as a bullshit job is that the person doing it feels that it's a bullshit job. The book is a half-serious anthropological essay, not an economic …
-
comment
Comment #47040779
This assumes every decision-maker is a rational actor. Just today an executive was rambling about "quantum-empowered AI". These are the people who take decisions about firing worke…
-
comment
Comment #46979405
"In aggregate" means few individuals on the planet, unfortunately, not the whole collectivity. This makes your statement almost almost surreal in my eyes.
-
comment
Comment #46878830
I get the same issue on Mac, if it's any comfort. I had to close and reopen the app 7-8 times to have my microphone recognized, despite it worked reliably on every single tool I ev…
-
comment
Comment #46867938
Despite me not being particularly interested in the AI hype and not seeking out discussions etc., I can tell you have seen many instances of people (comments, headlines, articles e…