Viewing profile — Uzomidy
Uzomidy
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 11, 2014, 8:49 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 81
- Public activity
- 16 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Uzomidy
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
story
Show HN: Some ask, "Will chatbots ever be conscious?"; I ask, "Are you?" → Test
Yes, this is a bit of fun. The test is hard to pass. Almost as if the goalposts were on wheels. As well as the test, the blog post links to my story C-Score, which is itself is als…
- story
-
comment
Comment #46573719
The BBC was always pretty establishment, but now they're very afraid of seeming “left wing”, and so we get this…
-
comment
Comment #38087994
That's what you need to do. Most people think streaks are unlikely, which biases people to void even small streaks. The algorithm expects that, so to fool the algorithm initially, …
-
comment
Comment #38080897
Whee, I did pretty well against it, managed to be at around 30%. https://imgur.com/a/GmaE45k (And no, I didn't write a Perl script, or have multiple goes to game the score, I just …
-
comment
Comment #35710037
Interesting critique. I'm curious if there's some other nice-and-simple framework you'd recommend?
-
comment
Comment #35704788
The article is a misrepresentation, apparently "believe in a higher power or God" has risen somewhat. This is different from excitement about organized religion , which seems to be…
-
comment
Comment #26326115
It's not 100% more — 100% would be twice as much. In this case, we've gone from none at all to having some, which is infinitely more.
-
comment
Comment #25367918
Does this mean that the Y combinator, Y = λf.(λx.f (x x)) (λx.f (x x)), is not a combinator?
-
comment
Comment #15210450
This has nothing to do with cryptographic security or predictability. This is about whether the output of the PRNG passes statistical tests for randomness. In a previous blog post …
-
comment
Comment #10670701
It looks like they used an automated tool to add copyright notices to files in the repository. Probably were required to do that by legal. So it's not 100% faithful history, but cl…
-
comment
Comment #8591796
The benchmark details are in the paper. It's a pretty ordinary Haswell PC.
-
comment
Comment #8591791
Looking at the PCG paper, it shows that a basic XorShift generator doesn't pass statistical tests as it gets bigger. Basically, there are some tests it never passes no matter how b…
-
comment
Comment #8591092
The graphs of failures don't show the PCG scheme because their number of failures is zero. The performance graphs show a whole bunch of PCG generators. You absolutely can predict t…
-
comment
Comment #8590839
Apparently, both the Mersenne Twister and XorShift (which seem to be two of the popular RNGs people use these days) can't pass all statistical tests. (The Mersenne Twister is prett…
- story