Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — TuxPowered

TuxPowered

HN member
Joined
Thu, Sep 05, 2024, 1:29 PM UTC
HN karma
11
Public activity
16 items

About TuxPowered

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49120651

    So will the Chromium bug 5569 finally get fixed?

  2. comment
    Comment #48636856

    > I've never seen a mobile phone AP offer IPv6 to clients, but if they do they have to use SLAAC-compatible IPv6 NAT in that situation. iPhone does that, and I’m pretty sure I’ve s…

  3. comment
    Comment #48626196

    > Nothing is stopping an ISP from implementing it by taking one ip and assigning ports 1-10.000 to customer A, 10.001 - 20.000 to customer B, and so on. Similarly, nothing is stopp…

  4. comment
    Comment #48626172

    > Even if you want to geek out and manage it yourself, a VPS is a very attractive option. And some VPS providers already started charging extra for hosting the server on Legacy IP.…

  5. comment
    Comment #48418570

    While debugging some issues in some system Claude refused to write test case because it broke terms of use. Oh shit, all this fantastic technology is in hands of corporations and t…

  6. comment
    Comment #47935070

    The availability of GitHub is still at 0% - it can't be reached over IPv6.

  7. comment
    Comment #47447297

    > not fully compatible with OpenBSD one The OpenBSD NAT and scrub syntax, and af-to are available in FreeBSD 15.

  8. comment
    Comment #47386598

    Even with IPv6 you still might have stateful firewalls allowing only for outbound connection at both ends (e.g. a CPE a.k.a. “WiFi router”) and to establish communication you’d nee…

  9. comment
    Comment #47322983

    > just like almost all transportation is done today via cars instead of horses. That sounds very Usanian. In the meantime transportation in around me is done on foot, bicycle, bus,…

  10. comment
    Comment #46235798

    It should always be at 0, because GitHub is unreachable over IPv6, which in 2025 should be considered an incident.

  11. comment
    Comment #46047274

    I did traffic shaping per user for a few hundred users on 1GHz Pentium III on Linux. It can be done just fine.

  12. comment
    Comment #45849160

    > On what's now almost 10 year old hardware, we could drop 44Mpps of a volumetric DOS attack and still serve our nominal workload with no impact. Was filtering done with pf, ipfw o…

  13. comment
    Comment #45667566

    > How do you avoid this IPv6 of course. > or is it just not important Port knocking not a security feature anyway.

  14. comment
    Comment #44922315

    Making my web resources IPv6-only has solved the problem for me. I don’t consider this a solution for ever, but for now it’s apparently way too modern or complicated for the A-so-c…

  15. comment
    Comment #44766320

    So that’s the only hope to get MRU tab switching in Chrime - get hired at Google?

  16. comment
    Comment #43977885

    Is this another incarnation of Sofort? Fortunately nobody is forced to used the former nor the later, you can either pay with card or just make your own SEPA transfer from any bank…