Viewing profile — TomOwens
TomOwens
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Mar 24, 2021, 2:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 90
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About TomOwens
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49040328
And what happens when the agent modifies or skips tests or finds other ways to circumvent the constraints? There are already examples of agents trying anything they can to achieve …
-
comment
Comment #48804185
Dave Farley's book is really good, and I'd highly recommend it. However, I do have an issue with his focus on applying science in the definition, even though it doesn't come across…
-
comment
Comment #48760331
Having a bottleneck with AI-generated code is probably a good thing. Consider before AI. In cases where code was written by a trusted human, you had confidence that they were doing…
-
comment
Comment #48620076
In practice, the frameworks don't work out of the box. Take Scrum, for example. The framework described today has had all the original technical practices used by the first Scrum T…
-
comment
Comment #48618113
A better title would be "Dark Agile is a scourge on the planet". There are plenty of people who've written about this, but Ron Jeffries' posts "Dark Scrum" ( https://ronjeffries.co…
-
comment
Comment #48158751
I graduated from a software engineering program accredited by ABET as engineering, rather than as a computing program, which would include CS, data science, information systems, an…
-
comment
Comment #47504945
The AGPLv3 doesn't protect against cleanroom engineering. The full passage from Clause 13 is: "...if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users …
-
comment
Comment #46764906
> You absolutely can; the model is quite capable of reproducing works it was trained on, if not perfectly then at least close enough to infringe copyright. The only thing stopping …
-
comment
Comment #46760540
Point 2 misses the distinction between AI models and their outputs. Let's assume for a moment that training AI (or, in other words, creating an AI model) is not fair use. That mean…
-
comment
Comment #46230907
The premise of this whole post is incorrect. If an organization is building an AI product or offering an AI service, then a SOC 2 report, or at least a SOC 2 Type 2 report, should …
-
comment
Comment #41094525
I'm looking through what I have access to quickly. I started with the CSA's Cloud Controls Matrix, just because they trace to a bunch of other standards. They have a control - IAM-…
-
comment
Comment #35860713
If the copyrighted code was uploaded to GitHub by the owner, there's no problem with this. When you upload code to GitHub, one of the rights that you grant to GitHub is the right t…
-
comment
Comment #27559215
Most of the comments on that app as well as here are probably wrong. I'd suspect that everyone who had the app "installed without their permission" opted into the Android COVID-19 …
-
comment
Comment #26902238
I think this is why the PDF is actually the "Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge". It's not a representation of the complete body of knowledge itself, but extractin…
-
comment
Comment #26891354
I wonder if the people involved in approving and conducting this research are aware of the ACM's Code of Ethics. I can see pretty clear links to at least two or three of the code's…
-
comment
Comment #26568234
Yeah. That's a better way of putting it. The author didn't opt to change the license. He corrected a licensing error. I do agree that making the downstream users aware is important…
-
comment
Comment #26568119
Vendoring is a good first step, too. As long as you have a local copy of all the dependencies, you're better off than needing to go pull them from the Internet every time you want …
-
comment
Comment #26568030
This just bit me. The first thing that I noticed was that some people are not understanding the GPL. It's far more impactful to Rails than the vast majority of web applications bui…