Viewing profile — TheLoneWolfling
TheLoneWolfling
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 21, 2013, 2:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,750
- Public activity
- 1,683 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About TheLoneWolfling
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #10187606
If the time differential is too extreme it will skip ahead or back instead of just skewing. > ...The ntpd algorithms discard sample offsets exceeding 128 ms, unless the interval du…
-
comment
Comment #10187531
And when someone embeds an entire book (that was otherwise written and they have the rights for) into the handshake, what then?
-
comment
Comment #10187514
> there are cases where the firmware inherently requires copyrighted material (For instance, requiring a (copyrighted) poem in a handshake).
-
comment
Comment #10186796
> Nothing says you can't acquire parts from another manufacturer, nor is there anything preventing you from performing the repairs yourself. Incorrect. > I'm not sure if you've bee…
-
comment
Comment #10186709
> If you want to blow away the firmware... False premise: you often cannot blow away the firmware, because it is either hard-coded, or signed. And even when said premise is correct…
-
comment
Comment #10185359
That has been tried before: https://web.archive.org/web/20140412085458/https://revokame....
-
comment
Comment #10185343
It isn't.
-
comment
Comment #10182937
You have a problem. You use a regex. Now you have two problems.
-
comment
Comment #10182893
Not possible. There are > 2 intersections with an odd number of streets. (Note that this includes dead-end streets)
-
comment
Comment #10182309
> You can do exactly what java calls enums with classes in C# No you cannot. You lose the single biggest benefit of enumerations - namely compile-time checking. (For instance: warn…
-
comment
Comment #10179957
Again, "Please don't post on HN to ask or tell us something (e.g. to ask us questions about Y Combinator, or to ask or complain about moderation)."
-
comment
Comment #10179677
So is it acceptable to post separate threads about the topic of paywalls, then? Because if so, please make that explicit. At the very least, I did not get that impression, and read…
-
comment
Comment #10179567
I think it is a subject that should be brought up. I do not think that a flat-out "stop complaining about it" is the proper response - and, to be frank, it disappoints me that that…
-
comment
Comment #10179538
What bugs me is not so much caching as redundant caching. I've seen applications that have 5 redundant caches, if not more (on-disk cache, OS cache, VM OS cache, stdlib cache, prog…
-
comment
Comment #10179509
For one, I do not consider this OK. For two, declaring rules and then declaring that no-one is allowed to talk about said rules sets a very dangerous precedent. For three, pretty d…
-
comment
Comment #10178830
Elaborate? I find it really annoying that C# enums cannot have constructors and variables.
-
comment
Comment #10178089
Look at birds. Bird lungs aren't actually continuously-pumping, but are a relatively small step away from being so.
-
comment
Comment #10178076
Note that there are organisms that include "wheels" (Or rather, rotary motion in general). It's "just" that the only organisms on Earth that do so are microorganisms. Look at flage…
-
comment
Comment #10177399
Again: I prefer longer lines and shorter line height. I am aware that I am in the minority on this front. I just wish that HTML had a sane way to allow client-side preferences (Lik…
-
comment
Comment #10177343
Ah, so not misunderstanding but difference of opinion. You consider software complexity comparable at a broader level than I do. A rather fundamental difference, and we have both m…
-
comment
Comment #10177303
I like C#. There are two reasons why I don't use it more. First, the whole .NET thing (Or rather, the lack of cross-platform compatibility). Yes, Mono is pretty good, but nowhere n…
-
comment
Comment #10176461
Ah. A misunderstanding. What was meant was "for each , doing X correctly is improbable enough that the existence of any piece of software doing X correctly may be considered to be …
-
comment
Comment #10176346
Considering that is not what I was asking for (I quote, "a functional browser that doesn't have bunches and bunches of exploitable bugs in its JS engine"), it, although impressive …
-
comment
Comment #10176332
I don't mind having a filesystem that works reasonably well on most devices. But I would consider "being able to append to a file reasonably quickly" as part of that "reasonably we…
-
comment
Comment #10176327
Again, there is a (massive) distinction between Turing-complete languages and non Turing-complete ones in terms of how often they are exploited (and in terms of how severe said exp…