Viewing profile — Tecuane
Tecuane
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 7:04 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 98
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Tecuane
https://elliot.pro/ | https://twitter.com/7ecuane
--
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/elliotspeck; my proof: https://keybase.io/elliotspeck/sigs/3PX7d7z1UckOUjAPe-lWmenB-Fbs5Yh4X1dRXiZ3qKQ ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #22516014
Relevant article, for the curious: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/malcolm-turnbull-prime-mi...
-
comment
Comment #22379129
DO's branding and a lot of their offering is pretty good, but their locations for non-US customers are much worse than many of their competitors. For instance (and a particular poi…
-
comment
Comment #22285721
> Inside of the home directory a file ~/.identity contains the JSON formatted user record of the user. It follows the format defined in JSON User Records. Why couldn't this have go…
-
comment
Comment #20682383
Passwords for Blizzard accounts are also case-insensitive, as they are converted to upper case before hashing. Try it! I first found this while working on a WoW server emulator in …
-
comment
Comment #19518002
I feel like as a collective set of industries across development and security we have been telling people for years not to reinvent the wheel because it's easier to stand on the sh…
-
comment
Comment #19473399
This sort of thing could not appeal to me any more, honestly. I've been trying to work out the most cost-efficient way of doing exactly this. Of course, I am aware that _the_ most …
-
comment
Comment #19470095
I've played WoW for something like 11 years, from its peak in around 2008-2010 and through its slow decline since. Logging in now and having the reality that this game is actually …
-
comment
Comment #19459899
My understanding of the policy matches the parent comment from communications I've had. Is this a recent policy change?
-
comment
Comment #19458840
I believe that at one stage the Quad9 resolvers were owned by IBM. A brief look at the site indicates it was transferred to CleanerDNS, which is a 501(c)(3). Do you know how much i…
-
comment
Comment #19252771
This is a rather unique take on Go that I haven't seen before. A quick scan of your post history indicates you feel quite strongly (negatively) about Go. May I ask what inspired th…
-
comment
Comment #18888017
That would probably be ICANN[1], and most authoritative name servers follow the policies set out there as the guiding committee is part of ICANN[2]. There are alternative DNS roots…
-
comment
Comment #18822873
> I wish there were fully functional privacy focussed ROMs that was shipped by Android OEMs. I'm sure everyone on this discussion board knows why this will never be the case, unfor…
-
comment
Comment #18271735
> Gitlab supposedly is Google-backed, so I don't want to have my private code there. This strikes me as odd. May I ask why usage of GCP is a deal-breaker for you? While I can under…
-
comment
Comment #18126873
I admit I'm not an American citizen, and have never actually stepped foot on American soil, but I do see the "first amendment" and "free speech" arguments being trotted out for alm…
-
comment
Comment #18036270
Looks like I have to be "that one", this time: Given there's a custom Git library in use under the hood, I don't suppose there'll be Mercurial support in the future?
-
comment
Comment #17913903
I used Ulysses but I ended up moving to Bear[1]. It's still. a subscription fee, but much cheaper ($1.49/mo). It's lightweight and perfect for what I use it for - taking notes. If …
-
comment
Comment #17729878
I really like Wire, for a large number of reasons - privacy and user experience among them. I've talked about it in the past[1]. If you get the time, please give it a proper whirl.…
-
comment
Comment #17549058
>I do forget to remap the esc key each time I do this, or the name of the thingie that helps you do that I don't suppose it's Karabiner[1], is it? This is the one I'm most familiar…
-
comment
Comment #16671776
As far as I'm aware they consider it to be a feature, and I don't particularly disagree. The rationale is that if somehow someone else manages to add a device to your account (whic…
-
comment
Comment #16656935
In Matrix, E2EE isn't enabled by default[1], and the option to enable it is in fact marked with a warning that it comes with potentially unwanted side-effects. This isn't the same,…
-
comment
Comment #16655743
Wire[1], another E2EE chat application (using libsignal, just like WhatsApp and Signal itself), does not require this. It also has open-sourced its client and server applications[2…