Viewing profile — Teandw
Teandw
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Dec 06, 2019, 2:01 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 356
- Public activity
- 126 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Teandw
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43133885
So they've launched this site without providing a singular example?
-
comment
Comment #40824566
A blog post that says a lot of words without really saying anything at all. The whole post boils down to "The founders of Reform have multiple companies."
-
comment
Comment #38591369
The profit is in the ink rather than the printer. There are two issues with someone coming into the market with a cheap printer/ink. 1) It's hard for any business to keep selling a…
-
comment
Comment #37789633
Legal requirement in the UK. No way around it.
-
comment
Comment #36625521
You've clearly not experienced the reality of enterprise then. You're opinions are based on a limited understanding and knowledge of real life situations when it comes to this sort…
-
comment
Comment #35224827
What. That's exactly how court works? How else do you think people and companies get away with doing a lot of bad things.
-
comment
Comment #35134364
Never thought about that. According to Mr Google; believed to come from the Latin phrase “quid pro quo,” which translates into "something for something," or an equal exchange for g…
-
comment
Comment #35134067
"And yeah, 80 million pounds of profit last year. I'd buy that for a dollar" In business, last years profits are often irrelevant. This is a good example. It's a constant treadmill…
-
comment
Comment #35133965
I'm not sure you understand what's happening here or the basics of business and liquidation. "Normal companies can't go bankrupt in one day" - They didn't go bankrupt. They went in…
-
comment
Comment #35133734
They didn't acquire client assets for £1. That's not quite how it works.
-
comment
Comment #35133697
You can't have a profitable bank that's insolvent. That doesn't make sense. The company has gone insolvent because it's no longer profitable.
-
comment
Comment #35133658
The token £1 is just a payment requirement for ownership. The bidding process for insolvent companies is essentially who will take on the most "problems" for the best outcomes for …
-
comment
Comment #33942694
Would I want certain things on the internet to be illegal, yes. Like they already are.
-
comment
Comment #33942651
The percentage of people with mobility disabilities is extremely high. With medical breakthroughs increasing the age of life too, this is only likely to increase with time
-
comment
Comment #33942622
Having a man in the middle of payments adds more benefits that it does cons.
-
comment
Comment #33939000
It's free in most EU countries. I've never paid for a bank transfer. The third party doing the transaction gives me some protection that I wouldn't otherwise have. Can't argue agai…
-
comment
Comment #33938980
Digitizing cash has moved civilization forward in ways we could never have dreamed of.
-
comment
Comment #33938879
What you said doesn't make sense. The seller requested the buyer to pull the money out of the bank into cash and then immediately deposited that cash into their bank account. What …
-
comment
Comment #33938865
Money laundering, like drugs, starts in larger amounts and is broken down further down the chain it goes. Those $5 and $10 bills getting laundered started from a $50K transaction g…
-
comment
Comment #33938830
Unfortunately we wouldn't move forward as a society if we didn't do things that affected people that didn't want to progress with modern ways of living.
-
comment
Comment #33938786
No matter how hard you try, cash is dying. If it's a good thing or not is another debate but you're not supporting anything by paying in cash. You're simply prolonging the death wi…
-
comment
Comment #33938719
You must be very slow using your phone.
-
comment
Comment #33938716
They don't trust a smartphone app provided by their banking provider but they trust a random bloke they've never met with 10k in their back pocket. Right. Makes sense.
-
comment
Comment #33938681
The problem with your thinking there is that you're making an assumption that removing rights is automatically a bad thing or a loss that affects us all, which is quite simply not …
-
comment
Comment #33938623
He's never actually given ANY evidence to prove what he's suggesting. He's only shown clinical cases which are basically "these people followed my advice and got better" - Which is…