Viewing profile — Taek
Taek
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 17, 2013, 3:11 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 8,687
- Public activity
- 1,756 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Taek
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49247200
Was on the 6th floor of a tower. Shaking lasted almost 2 minutes. There was no damage as far as I could tell (Medellín) but they still evacuated everyone to inspect the building. C…
-
comment
Comment #49204647
This title is killing me. "The runtime stays open" is such a heavy, attention grabbing sentence, it's all I can stare at on the front page. It's the type of writing that makes me h…
-
comment
Comment #48791642
That's a different bad UX pattern. If a button has already rendered in a certain location, a new button shouldn't replace it without first giving the user ample warning that a mate…
-
comment
Comment #48791624
I wish software apps had "tape-out rules" the way that computer chips do. Basically, when you design a computer chip, a program reviews the design and compares it against something…
-
comment
Comment #48780142
I don't think it's that bad, if I recall correctly it's about 8 kilobytes per token, and a token can be 3-4 characters so you're talking ~2 kilobytes per character. An image token …
-
comment
Comment #48737144
There's also Chinese models, which aren't trying to self-limit capabilities.
-
comment
Comment #48690494
Is anyone in favor of this?
-
comment
Comment #48663438
What is Krea's approach to content such as pornography and gore? It's been frustrating to see all of the leading models take a very hard line on excluding vice content, even when i…
-
comment
Comment #48440841
I hope you don't mind if I get super pedantic here. But what qualifies as "a problem", and what counts as "has not encountered before" and what counts as "adapted solutions"? Becau…
-
comment
Comment #48440434
Can you define a clear boundary for me somewhere between a rock and a human brain at which consciousness is definitely not possible on one side of the boundary, but is maybe possib…
-
comment
Comment #48440420
Yes I agree. We have such a poor understanding of consciousness that really we can't even rule out whether a simple set of if-else statements is enough to create consciousness. Com…
-
comment
Comment #48440391
If an LLM, which abstractly is just a stack of transformers, is able to reason about itself, why wouldn't a chess engine (also a stack of transformers) also be able to reason about…
-
comment
Comment #48440362
That's where things get interesting. As soon as you start asking what counts as communication... what about signals passing between cells? What about heat passing between atoms? As…
-
comment
Comment #48439191
On what grounds would someone establish than an LLM could be conscious but a sufficiently large/complex transformer model aimed at chess would not be conscious?
-
comment
Comment #48439181
"we" is the set of people who believe that machines can potentially be conscious.
-
comment
Comment #48439040
Another weird thing that keeps coming up - "people don't think that image models or chess models are conscious"... yes we do, and we have for many years. Or rather, we aren't *cert…
-
comment
Comment #48402102
Your comment is conflating a few things here, the philosophical problem of induction is one I am very familiar with, and it's also unrelated to what we are talking about. "If every…
-
comment
Comment #48401721
I think this argument is fragile, especially when you consider agents like Claws. Any LLM that is training on its own previous interactions with users has indeed directly experienc…
-
comment
Comment #48401650
It's not intuitive to me at all that the two are connected. Evolution adapted us to suffer because it is a powerful motivator for growth. It's not clear whether evolution adapted u…
-
comment
Comment #48393070
I've gone back and forth with AI on this stuff quite a bit, and there are many, many theories of consciousness, which is why when you were vague about the "more core" concepts, I a…
-
comment
Comment #48392215
Are you sure that AI-consciousness implies a responsibility to not make them suffer? Suffering is an evolutionary invention that motivates living things to improve themselves. But …
-
comment
Comment #48392197
Is it really so easy to assert that an AI doesn't have emotion? Lots of the AI models are capable of getting pissed off at the users, especially the earlier ones. And sure, their e…
-
comment
Comment #48392178
Wouldn't the context window qualify as persistent internal state, and the expansion of the context be continuous experience? Even within the realm of computing a single token, I'm …
-
comment
Comment #48392160
"nobody claims that non-text transformers, like AlphaFold, are conscious" - that seems like an odd take. There are plenty of people in the camp of panpsychism that would be happy t…
-
comment
Comment #48392129
> modern AI implemented via LLMs has almost none of the stronger or most core aspects of consciousness Can you elaborate on this? What are the specific "stronger and most core aspe…