Viewing profile — TA0x0

>"Told the truth." LOL. Yep, the kind of truth that got him fired with cause so hard the NLRB wouldn't go to bat for him. Correct, inconvenient truths. The NLRB actually agreed the…

>The reasoning presented in this thread is pretty representative of the thought processes Damore laid out in his memo. Logical, rational, built from facts. The thought process used…

>I submit to you it's exactly as irrelevant as skin color. It quite possibly is. No one mentioned anything about skin color except you. >I submit to you if you take the population …

>Yeah, that's exactly why that's not enough data to put together policy. Except it is, and I just proved it above. >You might as well measure bumps on people's heads to predict whe…

>Can you give an example? Theory: there are manifestations in African American culture that breeds violence. Policy: we need to funnel anti-violence education funds towards African…

>Making a terse sociological claim from statistics is almost always open to interpretation. Almost, but in specific cases like above, it is not open to interpretation. It's a raw f…

Interpretations are not facts. There are some facts, like the one I listed above, that are not open to interpretation.

>Quite possibly, if one shows one's work on how one arrived at that statement (statistics can be bloody slippery things, and while individual data points are facts, the analysis, i…

Those were theories to describe specific phenomenas, not facts. Certain facts are indisputable and not open to interpretation: FACT: African-Americans are more likely to commit vio…

Those were theories to describe specific phenomenas, not facts. Knock knock, science 101 is at the door calling for you.

Phrenology and hysteria are not facts, and their interpretations are not facts either. Some facts are not open to interpretation.

Are facts racist and sexist?

Facts are sexist and racist!

I responded to the comments below. These tools are not fundamentally broken, you're just ignorant in this space. They have always provided the functionality needed. Scripting can e…

>If you really want systemd to add this then I'm sure they will look at your feature request or PR. The less systems touches the better. >I would urge you to actually check with yo…

>I've already been in a forest of bash scripts and I would not go back there again. I have no comment on systemd's implementation but the implementation you're talking about is als…

The functionality to gracefully end long running background processes has been a part of standard killall, pkill, etc. for quite some time. Even then, yes, the functionality of usi…

You have to, since systemd implemented the feature incorrectly. You're missing the forest for the trees.

The functionality existed 25 years ago. systemd coming along and poorly implementing it provides nothing.

Sounds like you had junior admins at best leading your university's *NIX department. A mid-level admin in 1995 could have easily made a 100 line script to kill background processes…

Already happening. Instead of reserving, they're mining bitcoin by spinning up tens of thousands of dollars in infrastructure in the cloud.

They unfortunately do not support WireGuard. Mullvad is probably the best way to go at the moment.