Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — SwagtimusPrime

SwagtimusPrime

HN member
Joined
Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 5:55 PM UTC
HN karma
43
Public activity
18 items

About SwagtimusPrime

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #27201612

    It shouldn't be much of a surprise to learn that the r/bitcoin sub, bitcointalk.org, and several other bitcoin communities are owned by one and the same person that have a history …

  2. comment
    Comment #27201595

    Lol. Can you personally verify what your bank is doing? No you can't. If it was on the blockchain, you could.

  3. comment
    Comment #27201566

    That, and a lot of his ETH. The illiquid shitcoins are still worth a couple hundred million at the very least. +$200k in ETH.

  4. comment
    Comment #27201406

    mining is actually worse because of economies of scale. rich miners don't need pools so they don't pay fees, they get bulk deals and earlier access to the newest ASICs, they can pa…

  5. comment
    Comment #27201383

    benefits like killing the environment.

  6. comment
    Comment #27201284

    and UASF are a thing in PoS as well, if some entity/entities acquire a majority of the staked coins users can simply fork the malicious actors out. It's functionally equivalent exc…

  7. comment
    Comment #27201258

    Yeah sure, let me just buy a container full of ASICs worth hundreds of thousands of $$$ and I'll start mining: https://twitter.com/SGBarbour/status/1390504269925654532

  8. comment
    Comment #27201226

    It also costs a couple hundred bucks to run an Ethereum node. You are confusing running a validator and running a node, those are two independent things, just like mining and runni…

  9. comment
    Comment #27201165

    And Satoshi, just one person, owns tens of billions in BTC. That is the top 0.01%.

  10. comment
    Comment #27201141

    You mean the same guy that just donated $1.2b to the indian covid relief fund is just in it for the money? I have a hard time believing that. Vitalik doesn't even own half a percen…

  11. comment
    Comment #27196843

    Yes. Any action performed in the network will consume 99.95% less energy after this change has gone through.

  12. comment
    Comment #27196820

    >because bitcoin users actually validate blocks so do Ethereum users. >In a PoS system there is an incentive for large stakeholders to increase block sizes. this doesn't work becau…

  13. comment
    Comment #27196666

    >but comes at the great cost that people who aren't already in the game won't be able to acquire Ether without basically paying cash for it. That's a weird dependence on fiat curre…

  14. comment
    Comment #26945849

    it's not like solutions are heavily being worked on: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/a-rollup-centric-ethereum-r... , https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/04/07/sharding.html , https:/…

  15. comment
    Comment #26945733

    it's also important to note that stakers can not withdraw yet. once withdrawal functionality is enabled I expect many more folks to stake their ETH because the uncertainty will be …

  16. comment
    Comment #26945712

    >However it still is dominated by the "haves" vs the "have nots". Proof of stake is awarded to those with the largest stakes, which favors state-sponsored miners and works against …

  17. comment
    Comment #26945676

    there is in fact a fast-merge proposal that has community & dev support with a preemptive date of October 2021, if we're conservative February 2022. Once the merge happened PoW wil…

  18. comment
    Comment #26945651

    there will be decentralized & trustless staking pools such as RocketPool, where even if a loss of funds occurs the loss is subsidized through the entire protocol.