Viewing profile — Straw
Straw
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 27, 2018, 10:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 896
- Public activity
- 170 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Straw
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49191547
Market systems work especially well when supply or demand are constrained- they allocate the scarce resource more effectively!
-
comment
Comment #49191538
The data center demands are known years in advance. Its not like they magically appear out of nowhere. Perhaps we should eliminate the utilities guaranteed monopoly then! Monopolie…
-
comment
Comment #49191531
There isn't an externality here in the traditional sense. No one has a right to purchase anything at any particular price. Should people be disallowed from bidding in auctions beca…
-
comment
Comment #49173454
Why should they? If demand for X goes up, and price goes up, the whole point of the price system is to incentivize all users of X to use less and producers of X to make more. Here'…
-
comment
Comment #49137148
Although this is a neat idea, the author appears to be confused about how generative modelling works. They repeatedly claim that previous approaches rely on factorization to reduce…
-
comment
Comment #49136999
Sure. The most straightforward example would be utilities in much of the US. Companies like PG&E are literally granted a monopoly in a region. Another example would be epipens. The…
-
comment
Comment #49130721
Grocery store profits aren't larger than any other industry. Nor are they larger than in the past. Large grocery store chains do not have high profit margins. Sure, the total profi…
-
comment
Comment #49128495
There are many other factors affecting the size of corporations. For example, a significant increase in the amount of regulation in other sectors of the economy. More importantly, …
-
comment
Comment #49128382
I'd say exactly the same about antitrust. Can you give an example of a lasting monopoly not backed by some government policy? At any point in the last 150 years?
-
comment
Comment #49128367
You claim that a law that prevents or hinders you from making transactions with certain parties, while privileging other parties by exempting them from these restrictions, doesn't …
-
comment
Comment #49128297
Groceries are an excellent example of competition. Profit margins on groceries are razor thin. The large chain leverage results in lower consumer prices. Large grocery chains don't…
-
comment
Comment #49126585
If you wanted to do the most to improve competitiveness possible, by far the most effective strategy would be free trade. Trade barriers prevent competition from overseas, making m…
-
comment
Comment #49126569
No, governments tend to produce monopolies. Can you find true monopolies in the free market, in the last 100 years, that have lasted for at least 20 years, without some kind of gov…
-
comment
Comment #48593686
Oh, I wouldn't say that. The summary for policymakers they produce is incredibly alarmist compared to what their actual reports predict.
-
comment
Comment #48573584
Interestingly, the IPCC reports themselves (not the summaries for policymakers) are quite optimistic. IIRC something like, if we do nothing to abate emissions, climate damages in 2…
-
comment
Comment #48559621
MT is actually quite a poor (and slow) RNG! PCG32 suggested in the article has much better randomness, state size, and speed.
-
comment
Comment #48026606
A state is an entity with a monopoly on coercion. The tribal nations do not have this- while they have some carve-outs, ultimately federal law trumps theirs. So its not a matter of…
-
comment
Comment #48017454
The land and any associated rights was taken from the Native Americans by coercive force. Not a market. Not that they have any particular claim to it; states own land, not ethnicit…
-
comment
Comment #47988191
These all seem fine in a normal market? If the Native Americans have water rights, they can also sell them. They can choose to use it inefficiently on subsistence farming, or they …
-
comment
Comment #47982585
Standard oil not only reduced consumer prices for gasoline, but was already losing its monopoly to competitors during the antitrust trial.
-
comment
Comment #47982579
This causes major market distortions and worse outcomes than the econ 101 solution. The problem is that water isn't traded on a normal market at all. Lots of people have historical…
-
comment
Comment #47435227
This is nonsense. In every material good, the buying power of nearly everyone has increased in real terms over time, regardless of inequality. It's only in housing, with constraine…
-
comment
Comment #45853428
Navigation/maps providers like Google/Apple maps, etc, will incorporate price estimates as well as time estimates- they can even show multiple options if there are price-time trade…
-
comment
Comment #45852542
In a very weak form, yes- and yet it still seems helpful and even popular after people saw the effects of implementation.
-
comment
Comment #45852538
The congestion fees would go to the government responsible for the roads. Of course, they could be captured by the rich, but most governments spend most of their money not on the r…