Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Sophira

Sophira

HN member
Joined
Tue, Mar 19, 2013, 12:36 PM UTC
HN karma
1,552
Public activity
546 items

About Sophira

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49022121

    I'm guessing this is probably why I've been unable to connect to Codeberg with my very much human-driven browser...

  2. comment
    Comment #49017336

    WhatsApp is not in any way mandatory in the UK. I say this as someone who lived in the UK and does not use and has never installed WhatsApp.

  3. comment
    Comment #49003223

    As far as I'm aware, the monitor does not transmit a URL. Windows is looking at the hardware's vendor and device IDs and using those to look up and download the "drivers" that LG h…

  4. comment
    Comment #48976349

    Can you please share the chat log for this? I would absolutely love to see this.

  5. comment
    Comment #48838802

    DiscMaster[0] is useful for this! It seems to agree with you. There's nothing I could find named imposta.exe or aryala.exe, but I did find installa.exe. [0] https://discmaster.text…

  6. comment
    Comment #48828082

    This is a dang shame, honestly. The Google Earth Pro desktop app is a good one and I still use it all the time. Of note: Google Earth on web[0] and mobile are unaffected. According…

  7. comment
    Comment #48820262

    Can you link the specific post you're referring to? It's not "above" at this point in time.

  8. comment
    Comment #48813340

    How does this compare with the F-Droid version of OsmAnd? [Edit: To answer my own question a little bit, I found a post from September 2025 that compares OsmAnd and Organic Maps (w…

  9. comment
    Comment #48793264

    I don't have any specifics, but based on experience, it feels like software giants like to patent what a lot of people would consider obvious wins (such as interruptible animations…

  10. comment
    Comment #48792931

    I assumed that issues like "tap eight times for a no-op" not working was because of software patents not allowing the developer to do the obvious thing. Is that not the case?

  11. comment
    Comment #48791024

    I get around this by pairing JavaScript allowlisting with custom CSS and userscripts. I shouldn't have to, though.

  12. comment
    Comment #48745591

    > This would result in an airplane level of whirring while it used maybe a few GB of memory and hard drive storage to boot up Windows 95. In those days, RAM was measured in megabyt…

  13. comment
    Comment #48744368

    To be fair, .md is the ccTLD for Moldova, first set up in 1994[0], ten years before Markdown was even a thing. The ccTLDs use the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes, defined in 1974 …

  14. comment
    Comment #48738090

    Obligatory reminder that what the US government considers to be extremist activities includes the obvious crime of being interested in privacy and anonymity[0]. (Hence all the age …

  15. comment
    Comment #48726964

    There are three TLDs I block on my computer completely, and all of them are file extensions - .zip, .md, and .mov. (Yes, the domain "readme.md" exists. Fortunately, whoever owns it…

  16. comment
    Comment #48639503

    Similarly, Windows XP's release is closer to the release of the IBM 5150 (the first-ever IBM PC) than it is to today.

  17. comment
    Comment #48619335

    I haven't actually investigated that (and I'm not able to do so right now), so I couldn't tell you for sure. If that's the case, then yes, the forms method would be 'better'.

  18. comment
    Comment #48619312

    If it was one of the requests that would trigger a preflight normally, then yes, it would trigger a preflight. But the code as shown doesn't do that because "multipart/form-data" i…

  19. comment
    Comment #48618633

    > I guess the same trick might work with urlencoded forms, but it wouldn't work with multipart/form-data It does, though. See my reply at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618…

  20. comment
    Comment #48618539

    > ...there are ways to produce request bodies that are valid JSON even if the browser forces you into a different format... The browser basically never forces you into a particular…

  21. comment
    Comment #48618444

    Regarding the first part, it's easier than you might think to have a false sense of security. I've seen a web application that did, in fact, check the Content-Type header to make s…

  22. comment
    Comment #48618006

    That's not quite correct. POST requests with certain Content-Type headers, such as text/plain or multipart/form-data, will still be allowed without any kind of preflight. If the we…

  23. comment
    Comment #48617847

    If your web application specifically parses data based on the Content-Type that it advertises itself to be, then yes, the webapp would hit a parse error. But there are many applica…

  24. comment
    Comment #48617728

    My understanding was that "preventing otherwise disallowed HTTP requests" was the entire point of the preflight OPTIONS request, and that CORS will do nothing if the request would …

  25. comment
    Comment #48607667

    That video was super interesting, thank you!