Viewing profile — Sonic656
Sonic656
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 30, 2022, 3:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -1
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Sonic656
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42543708
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42184272
I laughed when Reddit suddenly spent months claiming Spotify is garbage despite It using 320kbps Vorbis and that the other 3 streaming platforms would dethrone It. Despite the fact…
-
comment
Comment #42184061
MP3 is only good at 18KHz at V0/320kbps, Yet AAC & Vorbis can handle full 22KHz at 256kbps VBR with hotter audio(-15 ~ -5db) their VBR models can just use 384 ~ 960kbps. Yes Vorbis…
- story
-
comment
Comment #41436090
Every encoding tool I've seen & use, All use Apple AAC in the QAAC wrapper. At ~160kbps VBR, It far better than Vorbis which needs 256kbps in some genres like Noise/Industrial and …
-
comment
Comment #39689420
There something darkly funny that Opus could act psychotic because It glitched out or was fed something really complex. But you could argue transparent lossy compression at 80 ~ 32…
-
comment
Comment #39689353
Love how Opus 1.5 is now actually transparent at 16kbps for voice and 96kbps is still beats 192kbps MP3. Meanwhile xHE-AAC still feels like It was farted out since It 96 ~ 256kbps …
-
comment
Comment #39588513
Really love the Audiophile tantrum because Spotify knows full well 320kbps Vorbis is transparent and why add a lossless mode that could go ignored?.
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #32288079
If they have ignore a whole genre with countless sub styles to say there codec is transparent at X bitrate & setting, Then It trash codec. MPEG-1 Audio Layer II wasn't tested eithe…
-
story
Ask HN: Why did Fraunhofer not realise how flawed MP3 was?
It can't handle a lot of electronic music at all without becoming a pre echo mess even at V0 & 320kbps?. Vorbis & AAC under 192kbps are no any better If I'm being honest, 96Kbps VB…